2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.14155
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of a quiescent galaxy at z=7.3

Abstract: Local galaxies are known to broadly follow a bimodal distribution: actively star forming and quiescent systems (i.e. galaxies with no or negligible star formation activity at the epoch of observation). Why, when and how such bimodality was established, and whether it has been associated with different processes at different cosmic epochs, is still a key open question in extragalactic astrophysics. Directly observing early quiescent galaxies in the primordial Universe is therefore of utmost importance to constr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average duty cycle of quiescent and active galaxies clearly reflects these trends with stellar mass, slowly increasing from f duty ≈ 0.6 for M å ≈ 10 7.5 M e to ≈0.99 for M å 10 9 M e . Noticeably, the quiescent galaxy Lilium ( M M log 8.7  =  ) has a duty cycle f duty ≈ 0.84, which is consistent with the values obtained for JADES-GS-z7-01-QU using different stellar population synthesis tools by Looser et al (2023). For instance, when considering the values derived with BAGPIPES in Table 1 therein, 7 the time from the first star formation event is t obs − t form ≈ 40 Myr, and the time of active star formation is Δt on ≈ 30 Myr.…”
Section: Nature Of Quiescent Systemssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The average duty cycle of quiescent and active galaxies clearly reflects these trends with stellar mass, slowly increasing from f duty ≈ 0.6 for M å ≈ 10 7.5 M e to ≈0.99 for M å 10 9 M e . Noticeably, the quiescent galaxy Lilium ( M M log 8.7  =  ) has a duty cycle f duty ≈ 0.84, which is consistent with the values obtained for JADES-GS-z7-01-QU using different stellar population synthesis tools by Looser et al (2023). For instance, when considering the values derived with BAGPIPES in Table 1 therein, 7 the time from the first star formation event is t obs − t form ≈ 40 Myr, and the time of active star formation is Δt on ≈ 30 Myr.…”
Section: Nature Of Quiescent Systemssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Lilium was selected among SERRA quiescent galaxies due to its similarity with JADES-GS-z7-01-QU in terms of stellar mass, duty cycle (Figure 3), and the time elapsed between SF quenching and observation redshift (Δt quench ∼ 15 Myr for Lilium versus Δt quench ∼ 10-40 Myr for JADES-GS-z7-01-QU). However, the stellar populations of Lilium are more metal-rich (Z å ≈ Z e ) than deduced by Looser et al (2023) for JADES-GS-z7-01-QU, Z å ≈ 0.01 Z e . In spite of these similarities, the SED we predict for Lilium (Figure 4, left panel) is too faint to match the one observed in JADES-GS-z7-01-QU.…”
Section: Comparison With Jwst Observationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These debates have led to great interest in observations of quiescent galaxies increasingly early in the universe. However, possibly due to observational constraints, the majority of the literature about quiescent galaxies has focused on low-redshift, high-mass sources (with some exceptions, e.g., Santini et al 2022;Weaver et al 2022;Looser et al 2023). The highestredshift quiescent/post-starburst galaxies to date are at z = 7. followed then by several quiescent galaxies at z ∼ 2-4 (Glazebrook et al 2017;Schreiber et al 2018;Forrest et al 2020;Valentino et al 2020;Nanayakkara et al 2022;Marchesini et al 2023), most with stellar masses 10 10 M e .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%