2012
DOI: 10.26879/323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of a Pleistocene mysticete whale, Georgia Bight (USA)

Abstract: Subfossil evidence, including a nearly complete dentary (~77%) (left mandible) and two badly eroded vertebrae, of a mysticete whale, were recovered, underwater, from an in situ context, in the Georgia Bight, 30 km offshore St. Catherine's Island, Georgia. The discovery of the mandible was initially made in 2006 but excavation was not completed until the summer of 2008. Two badly preserved vertebrae were found lying nearby having eroded from the same outcrop as the dentary. The two vertebrae were dated but not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.3, 2.6). Repenning (1983), Barnes and McLeod (1984), Mead and Mitchell (1984), Post (2005), Ichishima et al (2006), Garrison et al (2012), Noakes et al (2013), Tsai et al (2014), and this study. Subfossil records from Jones and Swartz (2009, fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…2.3, 2.6). Repenning (1983), Barnes and McLeod (1984), Mead and Mitchell (1984), Post (2005), Ichishima et al (2006), Garrison et al (2012), Noakes et al (2013), Tsai et al (2014), and this study. Subfossil records from Jones and Swartz (2009, fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These ages are clearly bimodal in their distribution suggesting either that: (1) any population surviving post-LGM is geologically "invisible", due to a lack of fossil evidence; or (2) the lack of finds reflects their true absence, indicating a significant decline or even the effective extirpation of gray whales across the north Atlantic Ocean in the period between ~40 ka and ~11 ka. The argument in favor for the latter may be further supported by geologic evidence for a much-reduced habitat in the north Atlantic during LGM due to the subaerial exposure of both the North Sea/Baltic and the Georgia Bight and Florida continental shelves (Alter et al 2015;Garrison et al 2008;2012;Harris et al 2013). Fossil evidence for the gray whale, however, may yet be found for the post-40 ka -11 ka interval on areas of the Atlantic continental shelf that were inundated at or during the last low stand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These ages are clearly bimodal in their distribution suggesting either that: (1) any population surviving post-LGM is geologically "invisible", due to a lack of fossil evidence; or (2) the lack of finds reflects their true absence, indicating a significant decline or even the effective extirpation of gray whales across the north Atlantic Ocean in the period between ~40 ka and ~11 ka. The argument in favor for the latter may be further supported by geologic evidence for a much-reduced habitat in the north Atlantic during LGM due to the subaerial exposure of both the North Sea/Baltic and the Georgia Bight and Florida continental shelves (Alter et al 2015;Garrison et al 2008;2012;Harris et al 2013). Fossil evidence for the gray whale, however, may yet be found for the post-40 ka -11 ka interval on areas of the Atlantic continental shelf that were inundated at or during the last low stand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Manuscript to be reviewed and the dentary based on its previous diagnosis (Garrison, et al, 2012) as this unique mysticete whale but both secure morphological and genomic attributes are lacking for the remainder of our samplethree dentary fragments. To include these latter specimens in our assessment of an extirpated population is problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation