2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503272112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of a novel amino acid racemase through exploration of natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana

Abstract: Plants produce diverse low-molecular-weight compounds via specialized metabolism. Discovery of the pathways underlying production of these metabolites is an important challenge for harnessing the huge chemical diversity and catalytic potential in the plant kingdom for human uses, but this effort is often encumbered by the necessity to initially identify compounds of interest or purify a catalyst involved in their synthesis. As an alternative approach, we have performed untargeted metabolite profiling and genom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second reason for thinking carefully about phenotype is because the probability of GWAS succeeding is directly related to the number and effect sizes of genes responsible for variation: The fewer the genes and the larger the effects, the more power for identifying the genes. Consistent with the expectation that it is easier to identify loci underlying variation in traits with a simple genetic basis, some of the strongest statistical signals are for metabolic traits for which there is a single enzyme or transporter that is responsible for distinct phenotypes (Lipka et al., ; Chen et al., ; Matsuda et al., ; Strauch et al., ; Shakoor et al., ). By contrast, we should not expect GWAS to provide extremely strong signals for genes that contribute to variation in highly complex multigenic quantitative traits such as height.…”
Section: The Importance Of Phenotype: Picking Traits and Minimizing Amentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The second reason for thinking carefully about phenotype is because the probability of GWAS succeeding is directly related to the number and effect sizes of genes responsible for variation: The fewer the genes and the larger the effects, the more power for identifying the genes. Consistent with the expectation that it is easier to identify loci underlying variation in traits with a simple genetic basis, some of the strongest statistical signals are for metabolic traits for which there is a single enzyme or transporter that is responsible for distinct phenotypes (Lipka et al., ; Chen et al., ; Matsuda et al., ; Strauch et al., ; Shakoor et al., ). By contrast, we should not expect GWAS to provide extremely strong signals for genes that contribute to variation in highly complex multigenic quantitative traits such as height.…”
Section: The Importance Of Phenotype: Picking Traits and Minimizing Amentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While many GWAS studies published to date focus on single traits, such as ion accumulation, main root growth, or compatible solute accumulation (Strauch et al, 2015;Baxter et al, 2010;Lachowiec et al, 2015;Slovak et al, 2014;Verslues et al, 2014), there is an increasing focus on multitrait response phenotypes, including RSA response to stress (Rosas et al, 2013;Kawa et al, 2016). An advantage of performing GWAS on multitrait phenotypes, also apparent in our study, is that additional confidence can be gained when the same candidate loci are mapped using different traits and/or different stress conditions or when the multitrait phenotypes are reduced to principle components that map to the overlapping loci ( Figure 3A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolites were extracted following a modified protocol of Strauch, Svedin, Dilkes, Chapple, and Li (2015). For each tree, extraction material (20 mg) was selected from all sampled leaf tissue visibly free of mold or necrosis to minimize the chances of sampling metabolites that were unique to fungi, altered or degraded during collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has been used in genomewide association (GWA) studies of Arabidopsis thaliana (Bac‐Molenaar, Fradin, Rienstra, Vreugdenhil, & Keurentjes, 2015; Fournier‐Level et al., 2011; Li, Huang, Bergelson, Nordborg, & Borevitz, 2010; Li et al., 2014; Strauch et al., 2015) because of its computational efficiency, and its ability to handle and control for population stratification (Price, Zaitlen, Reich, & Patterson, 2010) and environment. We tested for both SNP associations to each metabolite and for SNP associations to the property of chemical richness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%