2014
DOI: 10.1002/arp.1491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of a Byzantine Church in Iznik/Nicaea, Turkey: an Educational Case History of Geophysical Prospecting with Combined Methods in Urban Areas

Abstract: The city of Iznik, called Nikaia or Nicaea in ancient times, is located in northwest Anatolia, Turkey. Nicaea is renowned especially for the first Council of Nicaea convened by the Roman emperor Constantine in AD 325 in an attempt to unify the Church. During an international field course on the geophysical exploration of archaeological targets we detected the remains of a small previously unknown Byzantine church on a fallow lot of land inside the city. The church is oriented parallel to the ancient Hippodamia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent times, especially non‐invasive geophysical methods have been increasingly applied in geoarchaeological research (e.g. Hecht and Fassbinder, ; Welham et al, ; Rabbel et al, ). In this context, the calibration of geophysical data by stratigraphical information deduced from outcrops or sediment cores is an important component of data interpretation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, especially non‐invasive geophysical methods have been increasingly applied in geoarchaeological research (e.g. Hecht and Fassbinder, ; Welham et al, ; Rabbel et al, ). In this context, the calibration of geophysical data by stratigraphical information deduced from outcrops or sediment cores is an important component of data interpretation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a controlled experiment in Otay Mesa, California, USA, ERT successfully detected from the surface a tunnel dug through compacted soil, 11 m deep and 1.5 m in diameter (Butler, 2008 Finally, GPR is a common tool for mapping subsurface anomalies, as exemplified by the study of a mining shaft and slag pile (Avner et al, 2018), metallurgical workshops (Witten, Levy, Adams, & Won, 2000) and settlements (Novo, Vincent, & Levy, 2012). GPR is widely used in archaeological prospection and cavity detection (for examples see Chamberlain, Sellers, Proctor, & Coard, 2000;Rabbel et al, 2014) and, depending on the used frequency, can penetrate to depths of up to 40 m (Gosar, 2012). Lorenzo, Hernandez, and Cuellar (2002) can be deployed in multi 2D and even in 3D to detect the tunnel's geometry.…”
Section: Geophysical Methods For Cavity Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement areas (resistivity survey covered over 6000 m 2 , magnetometry survey covered 2500 m 2 , substantially overlapped (Figure ). Combining of near‐surface geophysics techniques is effective for detecting overlapping objects and for studying areas of historical and cultural heritage objects with a high level of interference and heterogeneous geological conditions (Negri, Leucci, & Mazzone, ; Rabbel et al, ; Vafidis et al, ).…”
Section: Methods Of Geophysical and Soil Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%