Abstract:The ability to respond to light has profoundly shaped life. Animals with eyes overwhelmingly rely on their visual circuits for mediating light-induced coordinated movements. Building on previously reported behaviors, we report the discovery of an organized, eye-independent (extraocular), body-wide photosensory framework that allows even a head-removed animal to move like an intact animal. Despite possessing sensitive cerebral eyes and a centralized brain that controls most behaviors, head-removed planarians sh… Show more
“…24. Planarians respond to ultraviolet light through receptors existing at the surface throughout their body (Birkholz & Beane, 2017;Shettigar et al, 2021). Therefore, if planarian behaviors associated with eye-brain interaction are analyzed, ultraviolet light should be cut off (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Previous Versions Of Fiji R and Rstudio Compatible With Older Ormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the body size of living planarians, use graph paper placed under a Petri dish. It can easily be confirmed whether planarians are undergoing regeneration or have regenerated by confirming whether the pharynx is positioned at the middle of the body. Planarians respond to ultraviolet light through receptors existing at the surface throughout their body (Birkholz & Beane, 2017; Shettigar et al., 2021). Therefore, if planarian behaviors associated with eye‐brain interaction are analyzed, ultraviolet light should be cut off (Figure 2a).…”
Research on individual behaviors can help to reveal the processes and mechanisms that mediate an animal's habits and interactions with the environment. Importantly, individual behaviors arise as outcomes of genetic programs, morphogenesis, physiological processes, and neural functions; thus, behavioral analyses can be used to detect disorders in these processes. Planarians belong to an early branching bilateral group of organisms that possess a simple central nervous system. Furthermore, planarians display various behavioral responses to the environment via their nervous system. Planarians also have remarkable regenerative abilities, including whole‐brain regeneration. Therefore, the combination of planarians’ phylogenetic position, behavioral properties, regenerative ability, and genetic accessibility provides a unique opportunity to understand the basic mechanisms underlying the anatomical properties of neural morphogenesis and the dynamic physiological processes and neural function. Here, we describe a step‐by‐step protocol for conducting simple behavioral analyses in planarians with the aim of helping to introduce researchers to the utility of performing behavioral analyses in planarians. Since the conditions of planarians impact experimental results and reproducibility, this protocol begins with a method for maintaining planarians. Next, we introduce the behavioral tests as well as the methods for quantifying them using minimal and cost‐effective equipment and materials. Finally, we present a unique RNAi technique that enables conditional silencing of neural activity in the brain of planarians.
“…24. Planarians respond to ultraviolet light through receptors existing at the surface throughout their body (Birkholz & Beane, 2017;Shettigar et al, 2021). Therefore, if planarian behaviors associated with eye-brain interaction are analyzed, ultraviolet light should be cut off (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Previous Versions Of Fiji R and Rstudio Compatible With Older Ormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the body size of living planarians, use graph paper placed under a Petri dish. It can easily be confirmed whether planarians are undergoing regeneration or have regenerated by confirming whether the pharynx is positioned at the middle of the body. Planarians respond to ultraviolet light through receptors existing at the surface throughout their body (Birkholz & Beane, 2017; Shettigar et al., 2021). Therefore, if planarian behaviors associated with eye‐brain interaction are analyzed, ultraviolet light should be cut off (Figure 2a).…”
Research on individual behaviors can help to reveal the processes and mechanisms that mediate an animal's habits and interactions with the environment. Importantly, individual behaviors arise as outcomes of genetic programs, morphogenesis, physiological processes, and neural functions; thus, behavioral analyses can be used to detect disorders in these processes. Planarians belong to an early branching bilateral group of organisms that possess a simple central nervous system. Furthermore, planarians display various behavioral responses to the environment via their nervous system. Planarians also have remarkable regenerative abilities, including whole‐brain regeneration. Therefore, the combination of planarians’ phylogenetic position, behavioral properties, regenerative ability, and genetic accessibility provides a unique opportunity to understand the basic mechanisms underlying the anatomical properties of neural morphogenesis and the dynamic physiological processes and neural function. Here, we describe a step‐by‐step protocol for conducting simple behavioral analyses in planarians with the aim of helping to introduce researchers to the utility of performing behavioral analyses in planarians. Since the conditions of planarians impact experimental results and reproducibility, this protocol begins with a method for maintaining planarians. Next, we introduce the behavioral tests as well as the methods for quantifying them using minimal and cost‐effective equipment and materials. Finally, we present a unique RNAi technique that enables conditional silencing of neural activity in the brain of planarians.
“…This is also the case for planarian flatworms, free-living members of the phylum Platyhelminthes, which not only display chemotactic behavior, but also respond to differences in temperature, contact, light, and water flow (Miyamoto and Shimozawa, 1985;Umesono et al, 2011;Inoue et al, 2015;Inoue, 2017;Ross et al, 2018). Although planarians can respond to light of different wavelengths (Paskin et al, 2014;Shettigar et al, 2017;Shettigar et al, 2021), they are not known to detect shapes (Walter, 1907). The sensory systems of planarians are well-integrated with their central nervous system (Agata et al, 1998;Okamoto et al, 2005;Inoue et al, 2015).…”
Detection of chemical stimuli is crucial for living systems and also contributes to quality of life in humans. Since loss of olfaction becomes more prevalent with aging, longer life expectancies have fueled interest in understanding the molecular mechanisms behind the development and maintenance of chemical sensing. Planarian flatworms possess an unsurpassed ability for stem cell-driven regeneration that allows them to restore any damaged or removed part of their bodies. This includes anteriorly-positioned lateral flaps known as auricles, which have long been thought to play a central role in chemotaxis. The contribution of auricles to the detection of positive chemical stimuli was tested in this study using Girardia dorotocephala, a North American planarian species known for its morphologically prominent auricles. Behavioral experiments staged under laboratory conditions revealed that removal of auricles by amputation leads to a significant decrease in the ability of planarians to find food. However, full chemotactic capacity is observed as early as 2 days post-amputation, which is days prior from restoration of auricle morphology, but correlative with accumulation of ciliated cells in the position of auricle regeneration. Planarians subjected to x-ray irradiation prior to auricle amputation were unable to restore auricle morphology, but were still able to restore chemotactic capacity. These results indicate that although regeneration of auricle morphology requires stem cells, some restoration of chemotactic ability can still be achieved in the absence of normal auricle morphology, corroborating with the initial observation that chemotactic success is reestablished 2-days post-amputation in our assays. Transcriptome profiles of excised auricles were obtained to facilitate molecular characterization of these structures, as well as the identification of genes that contribute to chemotaxis and auricle development. A significant overlap was found between genes with preferential expression in auricles of G. dorotocephala and genes with reduced expression upon SoxB1 knockdown in Schmidtea mediterranea, suggesting that SoxB1 has a conserved role in regulating auricle development and function. Models that distinguish between possible contributions to chemotactic behavior obtained from cellular composition, as compared to anatomical morphology of the auricles, are discussed.
“…For example, it was shown that ciliary gliding depends on serotonergic signaling ( Currie and Pearson, 2013 ), that peristalsis and scrunching are distinct gaits ( Cochet-Escartin et al, 2015 ), with peristalsis resulting from non-functional cilia ( Rompolas et al, 2010 ) and scrunching being a cilia-independent escape gait ( Cochet-Escartin et al, 2015 ). Thermotaxis, phototaxis and chemotaxis have been found to require the presence of a brain to sense their respective stimuli ( Inoue et al, 2015 ), whereas fission ( Malinowski et al, 2017 ; Goel et al, 2021 ), scrunching ( Cochet-Escartin et al, 2015 ) and avoidance of local near-ultraviolet light stimulation ( Paskin et al, 2014 ; Shettigar et al, 2017 ; Le et al, 2021 ; Shettigar et al, 2021 ) can occur without a brain.…”
Certain animal species utilize electric fields for communication, hunting, and spatial orientation. Freshwater planarians move toward the cathode in a static electric field (cathodic electrotaxis). This planarian behavior was first described by Raymond Pearl more than a century ago. However, planarian electrotaxis has received little attention since, and the underlying mechanisms and evolutionary significance remain unknown. To close this knowledge gap, we developed an apparatus and scoring metrics for automated quantitative and mechanistic studies of planarian behavior upon exposure to a static electric field. Using this automated setup, we characterized electrotaxis in the planarian Dugesia japonica and found that this species responds to voltage instead of to current, in contrast to results from previous studies using other planarian species. Surprisingly, we found differences in electrotaxis ability between small (shorter) and large (longer) planarians. To determine the cause of these differences, we took advantage of the regenerative abilities of planarians and compared electrotaxis in head, tail, and trunk fragments of various lengths. We found that tail and trunk fragments electrotaxed while head fragments did not, regardless of size. Based on these data, we hypothesized that signals from the head may interfere with electrotaxis when the head area/body area reached a critical threshold. In support of this hypothesis, we found that (a) smaller intact planarians which cannot electrotax have a relatively larger head-to-body-ratio than large planarians which can electrotax, and that (b) electrotaxis behavior of cut head fragments was negatively correlated with the head-to-body ratio of the fragments. Moreover, we could restore cathodic electrotaxis in head fragments via decapitation, directly demonstrating inhibition of electrotaxis by the head.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.