2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery and validation of human genomic safe harbor sites for gene and cell therapies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(80 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We undertook a computational search to predict intergenic genome safe harbor (GSH) sites in S. mansoni based on accepted criteria, newly introduced principles 13 , and genome sequence resources available for this schistosome, that could satisfy benign and stable gene expression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We undertook a computational search to predict intergenic genome safe harbor (GSH) sites in S. mansoni based on accepted criteria, newly introduced principles 13 , and genome sequence resources available for this schistosome, that could satisfy benign and stable gene expression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among common pMEIs, we then excluded loci that are associated with tissue-specific expression of nearby genes to further increase the likelihood of selecting region with no functional impacts. Second, unlike most current GSH mapping approaches that mask genome with arbitrary defined linear windows near important DNA elements [ 14 , 15 ], our approach is knowledge-based and considers 3D chromatin organizations of the genome and the 3D spatial distance between genomic loci. Third, stable expression of the transgene is essential for an effective gene therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing availability of genomics and epigenomics data, different criteria have been applied to genome-wide searches for GSHs in the human genome [ 14 , 15 ]. Generally, those criteria require a minimal linear distance from functional DNA elements such as promoters, enhancers, and coding sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer cell line culture and genome editing HER2 expressing cell lines SKBR3 and MCF-7 27 were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco) and 50 mg/mL Normocin (Invivogen), thereafter referred to as cell line growth medium. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in these cell lines was performed with RNP particles as described above with the following differences: the crRNA was specific for CCR5 56 (Supplementary Table 1); the nucleofection buffer was Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) (Gibco); the nucleofector protocol was EO-117 for SKBR3 and EN-130 for MCF-7; and the cells were diluted in cell line growth medium.…”
Section: Primary Human T Cell Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%