2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17195-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery and population genomics of structural variation in a songbird genus

Abstract: Structural variation (SV) constitutes an important type of genetic mutations providing the raw material for evolution. Here, we uncover the genome-wide spectrum of intra-and interspecific SV segregating in natural populations of seven songbird species in the genus Corvus. Combining short-read (N = 127) and long-read re-sequencing (N = 31), as well as optical mapping (N = 16), we apply both assembly-and read mapping approaches to detect SV and characterize a total of 220,452 insertions, deletions and inversions… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
160
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(135 reference statements)
11
160
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the proposition that the light allele of the second locus already segregated in the ancestral population of carrion crows (Weissensteiner et al, 2020) the maximum-likelihood parameter estimate of the initial allele frequency of the dark allele in carrion crows was below one (0.777). As maximum likelihood parameter values for the mate choice function we found (ζ, η) = (2.17, 0.617) and kilometer 302 on the transect as position of initial contact.…”
Section: Main Model: Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the proposition that the light allele of the second locus already segregated in the ancestral population of carrion crows (Weissensteiner et al, 2020) the maximum-likelihood parameter estimate of the initial allele frequency of the dark allele in carrion crows was below one (0.777). As maximum likelihood parameter values for the mate choice function we found (ζ, η) = (2.17, 0.617) and kilometer 302 on the transect as position of initial contact.…”
Section: Main Model: Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Examples for resulting mate-choice values for various parameter settings are shown in Fig. 2 B. 2.2.6 Fitting hybrid-zone model parameter to genotype data Weissensteiner et al (2020) inferred that the d allele of the NDP gene arose approximately 500,000 years ago and segregated in the ancestor of both carrion and hooded crows. Since the three genotypes DDll, DDld and DDdd all lead to the all-black phenotype, we therefore allow that the ancestral frequency of allele d in the west can initially be different from 1.…”
Section: Mate Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also inspected consensus sequences with unusual classification for being avian repeats like many DNA transposon superfamilies [19]. We then concatenated the new de-novo libraries with the avian consensus sequences from Repbase [93], hooded crow [94], blue-capped cordon blue [95], flycatcher [96], and paradise crow [23], and used this final library to mask all six genomes with RepeatMasker [97]. The new repeat libraries are given in Supplementary File S7 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nelson & Cresko, 2018; Poelstra et al., 2014; Todesco et al., 2019). In some cases, SVs are the long‐sought “mutation” underpinning, or contributing to, the genetic basis of traits relevant to adaptation and speciation (Van’t Hof et al., 2016; Weissensteiner et al., 2020). The joint analysis of sequence and structural variation is therefore necessary to capture the different axes of diversity and differentiation within and among populations, to identify the genomic basis and architecture of traits relevant for adaptation and speciation, and to pinpoint the evolutionary and demographic factors generating these patterns.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SVs are rarely analysed in a population genetics framework (but seeWeissensteiner et al, 2020), often due to lack of appropriate genomic resources (e.g. a high-quality reference genome is recommended for SV analysis) and the potential high-sequencing cost associated with reliably genotyping SVs in a high number of individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%