2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-008-9816-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery and characterization of a molecular marker for Sclerotinia minor (Jagger) resistance in peanut

Abstract: The production of cultivated peanut, an important agronomic crop throughout the United States and the world, is consistently threatened by various diseases and pests. Sclerotinia minor Jagger (S. minor), the causal agent of Sclerotinia blight, is a major threat to peanut production in the Southwestern US, Virginia and North Carolina. Although information on the variability of morphological traits associated with Sclerotinia blight resistance is plentiful, no molecular markers associated with resistance have be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the marker was not present in several virginia entries with good resistance. Core entries 103, 128, 208, and 273 that were selected from this study based on their resistance; and the reference cultivars Okrun, Tamrun 96, and Tamspan 90 were tested using polymerase chain reaction in the study by Chenault et al (5). Core entries 103, 128, 208, and 273; and Tamrun 96 each only had the 145 bp band for resistance.…”
Section: ---------------2-6 ---------------------------------------% mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the marker was not present in several virginia entries with good resistance. Core entries 103, 128, 208, and 273 that were selected from this study based on their resistance; and the reference cultivars Okrun, Tamrun 96, and Tamspan 90 were tested using polymerase chain reaction in the study by Chenault et al (5). Core entries 103, 128, 208, and 273; and Tamrun 96 each only had the 145 bp band for resistance.…”
Section: ---------------2-6 ---------------------------------------% mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bell) and web blotch which became apparent during screenings. Brief excerpts of this research have been previously published (5,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several resistant cultivars have been developed, but this requires field screening; growth chamber screening can be done (Melouk et al 1992) but does not work with all market types (Wilson 2008). By association analysis of 39 genotypes with 16 SSR markers, 1 SSR marker was found to be associated with resistance (Chenault et al 2009). This marker was found to work in runner, spanish, and valencia market types but not in the virginia market type (Chamberlin et al 2010).…”
Section: Sclerotinia Minormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using SSR markers, genetic diversity of peanut germplasm has been studied in Valencia (Krishna et al 2004), in mini-core collection (Barkley et al 2007), and in Chinese (Tang et al 2007) and Japanese peanut germplasm collections (Naito et al 2008). SSR markers have been identified and characterized for association with resistance traits such as rust and late leaf spot resistance (Mace et al 2006), and resistance against Ralstonia solanacearum and Sclerotinia minor (Chenault et al 2008). Genetic linkage maps with SSR markers have been constructed for diploid AA genome (Moretzsohn et al 2005), BB genome ), tetraploid AABB genome derived from a cross of cultivated with amphidiploids (Foncéka et al 2009), and tetraploid AABB genome in the cultivated peanut (Hong et al 2008, Varshney et al 2009Hong et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%