Discovering Usability: Comparing Two Discovery Systems at One Academic Library

Abstract

In the spring of 2013, the University Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago was in the unique position of having access to two discovery systems, Summon and WorldCat Local, at the same time. When tasked with choosing between the two systems, librarians undertook a usability study of Summon and WorldCat Local. The goal of this study was two-fold: to test the ease-of-use of each discovery system with an eye toward identifying one tool to retain for the longer term, and to learn about the search behaviors of different types of user groups.Eighteen subjects, consisting of undergraduate students, graduate students and faculty, participated in the study. Participants performed usability tasks using each tool and answered pre-task and post-task questions. While there was no clear preference among study participants for either discovery layer, individual groups did express preferences. Faculty, for example, preferred Summon to WorldCat Local at a rate of five to one. The study findings are explored in detail through an examination of the three major data sets produced by the usability test instrument: results derived from tasks performed by participants as part of the study; themes and trends identified by the investigators within the recorded participant tests; and discovery tool preferences as determined from pre-task and post-task questionnaires administered to study participants. This study has implications for librarians engaged in information literacy instruction; those considering implementing discovery tools, as well as for librarians currently using Summon or WorldCat Local at their libraries.

Vocational Training With Microlearning—How Low-Immersive 360-Degree Learning Environments Support Work-Process-Integrated Learning

“…To evaluate the effectiveness of the interactive 360-degree image in comparison to other Learning Management Systems, we used the qualitative questions of Çöltekin et al [53]. To check whether learners have understood the purpose of these tools, we used the questions of Djenno et al [54]. All guided questions can be found in Appendix C. For analyzing the qualitative semi-structured interviews, we followed the qualitative content analysis of Mayring [55].…”

Plataformas de descubrimiento en bibliotecas universitarias: evaluación de Worldcat local en el contexto de una biblioteca caribeña

“…Según la información aportada por bibliotecas de todo el mundo a Libraries.org (Breeding, 2016) incluso, ya han cambiado de plataforma, lo que podría constituir un indicador de la insatisfacción existente y de lo difícil que resulta anticipar el comportamiento de productos tan complejos (Dartmouth, 2009). Los usuarios, sin embargo, parecen apreciar la disponibilidad de una herramienta que los ayude a encontrar información en las bibliotecas y no parece que perciban diferencias significativas entre un metabuscador y otro (Georgas, 2013;Djenno et al, 2014).…”

Tabs and Tabulations: Results of a Transaction Log Analysis of a Tabbed-Search Interface

“…Similarly, a usability study on Ex Libris's Primo revealed that users were disappointed at the lack of full-text options (Comeaux 2012). Furthermore, even when students are capable of using a discovery system to complete tasks, many still opt to use Google or Amazon.com due to lack of overall satisfaction with a discovery system (Djenno et al 2014). Because discovery systems cannot satisfy every information need, many libraries choose to present their discovery tool as one of several options for searching library materials.…”