2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39804-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering Unbounded Episodes in Sequential Data

Abstract: Abstract. One basic goal in the analysis of time-series data is to find frequent interesting episodes, i.e, collections of events occurring frequently together in the input sequence. Most widely-known work decide the interestingness of an episode from a fixed user-specified window width or interval, that bounds the length of the subsequent sequential association rules. We present in this paper, a more intuitive definition that allows, in turn, interesting episodes to grow during the mining without any user-spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further interestingness measures for episodes, either statistically motivated or aimed at removing bias towards smaller episodes, were made by Garriga [5], Gwadera et al [10,11], Calders et al [4], and Tatti [17]. All these methods, however, were limited to finding interesting episodes, and stopped short of discovering association rules between them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Further interestingness measures for episodes, either statistically motivated or aimed at removing bias towards smaller episodes, were made by Garriga [5], Gwadera et al [10,11], Calders et al [4], and Tatti [17]. All these methods, however, were limited to finding interesting episodes, and stopped short of discovering association rules between them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the confidence of rule G ⇒ H would depend on our choice of disjoint minimal windows -if we chose the first minimal window of H, s [1,5], we would find two occurrences of G outside it and the confidence of the rule would be 1 3 , whereas if we chose the second minimal window of H, s [4,10], we would find just one occurrence of G outside it, and the confidence would be 2 3 . More importantly, whichever choice we made, we would not be able to get the correct result, showing that every occurrence of G is contained within an occurrence of H. Now that we have seen that we cannot define the confidence of an association rule using either the disjoint-window frequencies, or the containment of the disjoint occurrences, of the two episodes, we are ready to present a definition that corresponds exactly to our intuition.…”
Section: Using Minimal Windowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations