2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering semantic associations among Web services based on the qualitative probabilistic network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparing two services, many languages are used such as : WSDL, OWL, OIL 3 , DAML 4 , and etc. We used the service repository (UDDI) to do the semantic matching of web services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparing two services, many languages are used such as : WSDL, OWL, OIL 3 , DAML 4 , and etc. We used the service repository (UDDI) to do the semantic matching of web services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, they use association-rulemining approach and a hierarchical clustering algorithm for parameter names of Web services. In [5] by mining the historical invocations of component services, they construct a semantic model to describe their behavior rules based on the qualitative probabilistic network. Works which have 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering(ICSTE)…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The process model gives a detailed description of a service's operation; and the • Grounding which provides details on how to interoperate with a service, via messages. In particular, the semantic service profile in OWL specifies the semantics of the service signature that is the inputs required by the service and the outputs generated [5]. Furthermore, because a service may need external conditions to be satisfied, the profile also describes the preconditions to be satisfied before, and after execution of the service, some expected effects may happen.…”
Section: ) Overlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, reasoning with qualitative probabilities is much more efficient than reasoning with precise ones, the inference complexity of QPN is a polynomial in the size of the network [5], rather than NP-hard [6]. Therefore, many approaches have been proposed for QPN modeling and inference according to various kinds of applications [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%