2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2013.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering Non-redundant Overlapping Biclusters on Gene Expression Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in Table 1 show that our algorithm achieves much higher precision and recall than the bi-clustering [7] Ranks Sparse rank profile 26% 100% 63% CoreNode [29] Numerical Coherent values 43% 72% 58% FABIA [27] Numerical Coherent values 40% 24% 32% Plaid [26] Numerical Coherent values 90% 6% 48% SAMBA [23] Numerical Coherent evolution 67% 3% 35% ISA [28] Numerical Coherent values 64% 44% 54% CC [24] Numerical Coherent values 35% 22% 29% Spectral [25] Numerical Coherent values ---methods, which were run on the original data. Note that Spectral method [25] did not return any result.…”
Section: Comparison To Bi-clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in Table 1 show that our algorithm achieves much higher precision and recall than the bi-clustering [7] Ranks Sparse rank profile 26% 100% 63% CoreNode [29] Numerical Coherent values 43% 72% 58% FABIA [27] Numerical Coherent values 40% 24% 32% Plaid [26] Numerical Coherent values 90% 6% 48% SAMBA [23] Numerical Coherent evolution 67% 3% 35% ISA [28] Numerical Coherent values 64% 44% 54% CC [24] Numerical Coherent values 35% 22% 29% Spectral [25] Numerical Coherent values ---methods, which were run on the original data. Note that Spectral method [25] did not return any result.…”
Section: Comparison To Bi-clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inequalities (14) and (15) are introduced to remove the absolute operator of the summations in Equation (12). Inequalities (16) and (17) are due to Theorem 1. Inequality (18) ensures that the reconstructed matrix is a rank matrix.…”
Section: Sparse Rmf Using Integer Linear Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since large noise levels may conversely affect the performance of the algorithms, we use a dataset also used for the previous experiments, with p = 0.05 (low noise level). We ran all algorithms on this dataset and took the first seven Ranked tile 37% 41% 39% CoreNode [16] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 30% 8% 19% FABIA [13] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 99% 51% 75% Plaid [12] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 91% 46% 67% SAMBA [14] Numerical Coherent evolution bicluster 52% 9% 31% ISA [15] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 43% 17% 30% CC [10] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 7% 5% 6% Spectral [11] Numerical Coherent values bicluster --tiles/bi-clusters they produced, which have the highest scores (SAMBA) or largest sizes (all other). For most of the benchmarked algorithms, we used their default values.…”
Section: Data Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data type Pattern Precision Recall F1 Our algorithm Ranks Ranked tile 88% 83% 86% CoreNode [9] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 43% 72% 58% FABIA [7] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 40% 24% 32% Plaid [6] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 90% 6% 48% SAMBA [3] Numerical Coherent evolution bicluster 67% 3% 35% ISA [8] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 64% 44% 54% CC [4] Numerical Coherent values bicluster 35% 22% 29% Spectral [5] Numerical Coherent values bicluster --- Diverse query-based ranked tiling Finally, we use the same dataset, with p = 0.2, to illustrate diverse query-based ranked tiling. Figure 4a shows a query consisting of two columns, and Figure 4b shows the two discovered ranked tiles given that query.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%