2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering Computer-Assisted Learning Processes based on Objective Exam Score Transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand. Reproducible Computing and objective measurements, empower us to research actual learning processes and reveal important guidelines for the improvement of the effectiveness of learning through improved software usability ( [22], [23]) and a series of cognitive, behavioral, and constructivist incentives [24], [25].…”
Section: Measurement Errors In Self Reported Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand. Reproducible Computing and objective measurements, empower us to research actual learning processes and reveal important guidelines for the improvement of the effectiveness of learning through improved software usability ( [22], [23]) and a series of cognitive, behavioral, and constructivist incentives [24], [25].…”
Section: Measurement Errors In Self Reported Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For obvious reasons, Reproducible Computing allows one to collect such measurements of high quality even if the student population is very large. The learning outcomes however, need to subjected to critical analysis too, as is explained in a recent paper [25] in which the effect of objective exam score transformations is studied. The paper includes a mathematical description of an easy-to-use methodology and an illustrated case in which the effect of exam score transformations is clearly demonstrated.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Constructivism and Computer Assited Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology that allows us to do this is based on a mathematical model which is described in [40] and relates the learning outcomes to objectively measured activities and reported experiences.…”
Section: Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third model (M 3 ) simply combines M 1 and M 2 by relating^ y to X in the regression model^ y = X f+ u. The estimator for f can be shown to be^ f = (X X) 40]). M 3 is likely to yield different results from M 1 unless the estimated parameters M 2 are (nearly) equal to the original weights^ c = (…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%