Proceedings of the 2016 2nd Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications 2016
DOI: 10.2991/wartia-16.2016.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering Authoritative users in Question Answer Communities: A Case Study of Stack Overflow

Abstract: Question answer communities such as Stack Overflow and Yahoo! Answers are becoming more and more popular knowledge sharing communities, which have attracted great interest from both industry and academia. On such communities, people can ask questions of any kind and then wait for someone else to answer the questions. Nevertheless, in many cases, the questioners cannot get satisfactory answers from the answerers. In order to make the questioners obtain satisfactory answers, it is very necessary for question ans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a surge of research on Q&A communities due to their importance for knowledge diffusion and open-ended complex problem solving [1517]. Popular topics include identification of authorities [18,19] and topical experts [20] based on classical algorithms such as PageRank and Hyperlink-Induced Topic Search (HITS), which are widely used for finding key users in social network. We review these methods in the following subsections.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a surge of research on Q&A communities due to their importance for knowledge diffusion and open-ended complex problem solving [1517]. Popular topics include identification of authorities [18,19] and topical experts [20] based on classical algorithms such as PageRank and Hyperlink-Induced Topic Search (HITS), which are widely used for finding key users in social network. We review these methods in the following subsections.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%