2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourses on governing diversity in Europe: Critical analysis of the White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…European cultural politics is thus a risky endeavour, since it can be a means to impose a normative construction of the 'good citizen' . The promotion of intercultural dialogue can also become a uniformizing and monocultural project (Lähdesmäki and Wagener 2015).…”
Section: From Rule-based Harmonization To Learning From Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…European cultural politics is thus a risky endeavour, since it can be a means to impose a normative construction of the 'good citizen' . The promotion of intercultural dialogue can also become a uniformizing and monocultural project (Lähdesmäki and Wagener 2015).…”
Section: From Rule-based Harmonization To Learning From Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural diversity has become one of the key words in the European Union's (EU) policy rhetoric and governance, but terms such as identity, culture and inter-culturality often remain unclear and open to discursive manipulation (Lähdesmäki and Wagener 2015). While the analysis of policy discourses remains relevant, to better understand the role of cultural diversity in EU politics, it is also of utmost importance to direct attention to the effects of EU policies on the ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘United in diversity’ is the motto of the European Union (EU), which aims to signify ‘how Europeans have come together, in the form of the EU, to work for peace and prosperity, while at the same time being enriched by the continent’s many different cultures, traditions and languages’ (EUROPA, 2015: 1). Such proclamations are one part of a broader assemblage of debates taking place across the continent in which the term ‘diversity’ has been used with growing frequency to both describe contemporary socio-demographic changes that have arisen as a result of international (and intra-European) migrations and to anchor discussions over governance reform and the direction of social and economic policy (Lädesmäki and Wagener, 2015). The extent of socio-cultural diversity is growing, with official estimates stating that 9.9% of the EU’s population now consists of citizens born in a country different to the one in which they reside.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning of the concept is produced from a hegemonic point of view, which generates power positions of a dialoguer and dialoguee to the "intercultural dialogue". As Lähdesmäki's and Wagener's (2015) analysis of this white paper indicates, immigrants and minority communities commonly represent the dialoguees in the policy discourse, the people to whom Europe's culture has to be delivered and introduced in order to make them the other part of the dialogue. As a policy, intercultural dialogue aims at the more effective integration in European societies that is, according to the white paper, "needed to allow immigrants to participate fully in the life of the host country.…”
Section: Tackling Challenges: the Council Of Europementioning
confidence: 99%