Discourses on Downsizing: Structure and Sentiment in an Organizational Dispute

deRoche, Constance

doi:10.2307/25605858

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lower-status merger partners may support the group changes implied in a merger as far as they can envision to acquire a positive social identity within the post-merger framework. For higher-status merger partners, maintaining positive social identity is unproblematic, as they tend to take their own culture for granted as defining normality, and perceive the other group as deviating from that normality (Haspeslagh and Jemison, 1991;DeRoche, 1997). Efforts to transform the other group like one's own can follow these perceptions.…”

Section: Identity Fit: the Social Identity Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

They (Don’t) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (postmerger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations' perspective on mergers (N's = 479, 150, 266, 113, and 229, respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect postmerger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs. systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1-5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1-3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change.

show abstract

Section: Identity Fit: the Social Identity Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%