2017
DOI: 10.1111/tri.13017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discordant rejection in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: true discordance or analysis artefact?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study by Uva et al showed that a positive renal biopsy for rejection correctly predicts pancreatic rejection in 86% of cases with concurrent pancreatic dysfunction, albeit they also did not stratify by presence of DSA [ 18 ]. Furthermore, there is debate whether discordancy truly exists or whether it’s merely a matter of time [ 19 , 20 ]. Our report illustrates the timely development from a single episode of clinical pancreatitis with DSA formation to recurrent pancreatitis, to eventually kidney transplant dysfunction with biopsy proven chronic mixed type ABMR and a biopsy-proven panniculitis to underscore the likelihood of chronic pancreas rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Uva et al showed that a positive renal biopsy for rejection correctly predicts pancreatic rejection in 86% of cases with concurrent pancreatic dysfunction, albeit they also did not stratify by presence of DSA [ 18 ]. Furthermore, there is debate whether discordancy truly exists or whether it’s merely a matter of time [ 19 , 20 ]. Our report illustrates the timely development from a single episode of clinical pancreatitis with DSA formation to recurrent pancreatitis, to eventually kidney transplant dysfunction with biopsy proven chronic mixed type ABMR and a biopsy-proven panniculitis to underscore the likelihood of chronic pancreas rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%