“…In the case of Chlorocebus , Perelman et al (2011) included C. aethiops , C. sabaeus , and C. cynosures , but not C. pygerythrus . However, given how closely related the species within the genus Chlorocebus are, and current debates regarding species versus subspecies status (Elton, Dunn, & Cardini, 2010; Grubb et al, 2003; Haus, Roos, & Zinner, 2010), the average genetic distance between all Chlorocebus taxa and M. mulatta (99.98 units) and M. fascicularis (100.25 units), respectively, were calculated. As the resultant genetic distances are species, but not sex, specific, and in order to provide a point of comparison with the two morphological distance matrices where sex and species were considered separately, the genetic distance among sexes of the same species were considered to be zero.…”