2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discordance Between Clinical Assessment and Invasive Hemodynamics in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

Abstract: BACKGROUND-Historically, invasive hemodynamic guidance was not superior compared to clinical assessment in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This study assessed the accuracy of clinical assessment versus. invasive hemodynamics in patients with ADHF.METHODS AND RESULTS-We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients admitted with ADHF. Prior to RHC, physicians categorically predicted right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac index (CI) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation and monitoring of fluid excess status in patients admitted for ADHF is currently based on clinical history, physical examination, chest X-ray, and natriuretic peptides. 5 However, all these have inherent substantial inter-observer variability and may be non-specific, 6,16 and plasma levels of biomarkers have a limited capacity to assess quantitatively the extent of fluid retention. 17 Right heart catheterization and chest-computed tomography are much more accurate Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6 min walk test; ACE inhibitor, angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin-receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CV, cardiovascular; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study formula); HF, heart failure; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LUS, lung ultrasound; Minnesota LWHF, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure quality of life scale; NT-proBNP, amino terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association.…”
Section: Prognosis Of Residual Congestion In Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation and monitoring of fluid excess status in patients admitted for ADHF is currently based on clinical history, physical examination, chest X-ray, and natriuretic peptides. 5 However, all these have inherent substantial inter-observer variability and may be non-specific, 6,16 and plasma levels of biomarkers have a limited capacity to assess quantitatively the extent of fluid retention. 17 Right heart catheterization and chest-computed tomography are much more accurate Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6 min walk test; ACE inhibitor, angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin-receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CV, cardiovascular; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study formula); HF, heart failure; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LUS, lung ultrasound; Minnesota LWHF, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure quality of life scale; NT-proBNP, amino terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association.…”
Section: Prognosis Of Residual Congestion In Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7% (N = 7) of patients in total had percutaneous mechanical support devices (N = 6, Intra-aortic balloon pump; N = 1, Impella) with inotropes and/or vasopressors prior to RHC. Median RA pressure was 15.5 (10,22) ; PCWP (21,35) vs. 1.1 (0.7, 1.5), p = .001]. There were no other significant differences between hemodynamic variables observed between the two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…More liberal use of hemodynamic assessment may be needed to better classify NYHA Class III‐IV patients presenting with ADHF 37 . Early RHC should be considered in these patients even when clinical assessment, and particularly the physical exam, is not otherwise indicative of cardiogenic shock 10 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, many patients may have residual abnormal hemodynamics following LVAD support. Second, such abnormal hemodynamics are sometimes a challenge to clinically detect by physical examination alone [17]. Third, as discussed below, such abnormal hemodynamics are associated with future adverse events following LVAD implantation.…”
Section: Hemodynamics and Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%