DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036529648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for (non)conservative partial differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the characteristics of A ijk at an interface affect the numerical flux (q k n j ) * at that interface. Derivation of an appropriate numerical flux which is stable and convergent can be done using techniques demonstrated in Hesthaven and Warburton [27] and Rhebergen [28].…”
Section: Non-conservation Form Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the characteristics of A ijk at an interface affect the numerical flux (q k n j ) * at that interface. Derivation of an appropriate numerical flux which is stable and convergent can be done using techniques demonstrated in Hesthaven and Warburton [27] and Rhebergen [28].…”
Section: Non-conservation Form Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
The discontinuous Galerkin finite element method (DGFEM) developed by Rhebergen et al [1] offers a robust method for solving systems of nonconservative hyperbolic partial differential equations but, as we show here, does not satisfactorily deal with topography in shallow water flows at lowest order (so-called DG0, or equivalently finite volume). In particular, numerical solutions of the space-DG0 discretised one-dimensional shallow water equations over varying topography are not truly 'well-balanced'.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We note also that, for DG1 and above, if b h is initially discontinuous across elements (cf. [1]) then it evolves to a nearby continuous solution, at which point numerical solutions for b and h remain steady. For completeness, a proof that the DG1 discretization satisfies all aspects of well-balanced flow, first published in RBV2008, is reproduced here using our notation in appendix A.…”
Section: Does Rest Flow Remain At Rest?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last term on the left‐hand side of Eq. is the nonconservative product, where G 4 × 2 × 4 is a third‐order tensor that cannot be expressed as the Jacobian of some matrix . Let G ijk be a component of bold-italicG .…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%