2009
DOI: 10.1137/070700267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuous Discretization for Least-Squares Formulation of Singularly Perturbed Reaction-Diffusion Problems in One and Two Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is caused by a small interval of width O(ǫ) or O( √ ǫ) (so-called boundary layer) in which u ′′ rapidly changes. Since the solution of the standard FEM exhibits large nonphysical oscillation, many stabilization techniques have been suggested, including upwind, streamline-diffusion FEMs, discontinuous Galerkin methods, and least-squares FEMs [13,14,17,20]. Another effective way for globally solving this problem is to construct a numerical scheme on a layer adapted mesh, such as Shishkin type meshes and Bakhvalov type meshes.…”
Section: −ǫUmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is caused by a small interval of width O(ǫ) or O( √ ǫ) (so-called boundary layer) in which u ′′ rapidly changes. Since the solution of the standard FEM exhibits large nonphysical oscillation, many stabilization techniques have been suggested, including upwind, streamline-diffusion FEMs, discontinuous Galerkin methods, and least-squares FEMs [13,14,17,20]. Another effective way for globally solving this problem is to construct a numerical scheme on a layer adapted mesh, such as Shishkin type meshes and Bakhvalov type meshes.…”
Section: −ǫUmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments indicate that, when λ i and µ i are properly selected, the method has better computational performance, though the convergence rate remains the same; cf. [35].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the DGLSFEM proposed here is very robust with respect to the numerical fluxes defined in (19) and (20). [35] are used in the proof of Theorem 1, which nonetheless have been adjusted to treat difficulties caused by the interfaces. In particular, continuous shape functions are required for nodes on Γ 0 , as indicated in (8).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations