2014
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discomfort assessment in peripheral angiography: Randomized clinical trial of Iodixanol 270 versus Ioversol 320 in diabetics with critical limb ischemia

Abstract: Iodixanol caused less frequent and severe discomfort, characterized as pain and heat during intra-arterial administration compared with Ioversol. The pain severity is tightly related to image and diagnosis quality with an impact on the patients for additional injections and larger CM volumes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that treating physicians may preferentially administer IOCM to higher risk patients. Additionally, operators may select IOCM for perceived lower risks of major allergic complications or more tolerable symptoms during injection, particularly with peripheral procedures [31]. Despite their higher baseline risk, after adjusting for hospital fixed effects, patient demographics and comorbid conditions of the cohort, the use of IOCM was associated with fewer adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that treating physicians may preferentially administer IOCM to higher risk patients. Additionally, operators may select IOCM for perceived lower risks of major allergic complications or more tolerable symptoms during injection, particularly with peripheral procedures [31]. Despite their higher baseline risk, after adjusting for hospital fixed effects, patient demographics and comorbid conditions of the cohort, the use of IOCM was associated with fewer adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the type of contrast has varied in this context amongst studies, there has been a shift in many centers to use of non‐ionic low osmolar and particularly to iso‐osmolar agents in the setting of peripheral angiography . Reduction of patient pain and therefore unwanted patient motion during angiography has been the basis for the use of iso‐osmolar agents .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For peripheral angiography, low osmolar agents were used more frequently in the survey. There is a small but growing body of literature which would support the use of iso‐osmolar contrast for peripheral imaging as there is less patient discomfort and motion artifact . Use of CO 2 for peripheral angiography was rarely used by the survey respondents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%