1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00075-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosure of true diagnosis in Japanese cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that 97% of doctors in the USA feel that they should tell the patient about his/her fatal illness and 78% of them have already done so [32,42]. But in many countries nondisclosure is still common [27,28]. Over half of our patients (54.7%) being unaware of their cancer diagnosis may be explained in two ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been found that 97% of doctors in the USA feel that they should tell the patient about his/her fatal illness and 78% of them have already done so [32,42]. But in many countries nondisclosure is still common [27,28]. Over half of our patients (54.7%) being unaware of their cancer diagnosis may be explained in two ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a study from India, psychiatric morbidity is significantly lower in patients who are "unaware" of the diagnosis of cancer and who have a more hopeful outlook on the outcome of treatment [2]. On the contrary, in a study by Hosaka et al in Japan [28], the prevalence rate of psychiatric disorders was 42.9% in the informed group and 48.3% in the uninformed group, suggesting that concealing the true diagnosis is not related to the presence of psychiatric disorder in Japanese cancer patients. On the other hand, some studies have shown that the possible cost of poor communication with cancer patients include increased anxiety, distress, coping difficulties, and noncompliance with treatment [21,35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By 1977, this had reversed, with 97% preferring to tell a cancer patient the diagnosis [4]. Nowadays, in many developed countries, the attitudes of physicians towards informing cancer patients about their diagnosis have changed to truth-telling and disclosure of all important facts related to the disease [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rationale for holding discretionary power, doctors report a number of compelling reasons such as the need to protect patients from psychological distress caused by disclosure of the diagnosis, families' wishes for non-disclosure to patients, and the fact that most patients themselves do not wish to be told the truth [9,17,18]. However, several case-control studies report that there is no relationship between cancer disclosure and mental harm [19-21]. As family members are more reluctant than patients to disclose the truth [11,22], patients' needs for information are often unsatisfied in Japan where physicians often discuss the cancer diagnosis with family prior to informing the patient [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%