Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0533-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis

Abstract: In surveys, individuals tend to misreport behaviors that are in contrast to prevalent social norms or regulations. Several design features of the survey procedure have been suggested to counteract this problem; particularly, computerized surveys are supposed to elicit more truthful responding. This assumption was tested in a meta-analysis of survey experiments reporting 460 effect sizes (total N =125,672). Self-reported prevalence rates of several sensitive behaviors for which motivated misreporting has been f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
207
5
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
10
207
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, answers to questions about alcohol consumption may be influenced by social desirability bias (Tourangeau & Yan, 2007), although this bias seems to be reduced in internet-based studies like the current one (Bowling, 2005;Gnambs & Kaspar, 2015).…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, answers to questions about alcohol consumption may be influenced by social desirability bias (Tourangeau & Yan, 2007), although this bias seems to be reduced in internet-based studies like the current one (Bowling, 2005;Gnambs & Kaspar, 2015).…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recall failure can be reduced by using memory priming strategies and event history calendars to focus memory search (Drasch & Matthes, 2013). Conscious nondisclosure can be reduced by increasing anonymity; for example, by having respondents privately record sensitive information in a self-report booklet that is sealed before returning it to the interviewer or via private computerized self-administration (Gnambs & Kaspar, 2015). There is some concern that complete anonymity can reduce motivation to report accurately (Lelkes, Krosnick, Marx, Judd, & Park, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If so, this will question the validity of such self-report measures in a pencil-and-paper administration mode, adding a new aspect to the ongoing debate about administration mode effects (cf. Gnambs & Kaspar, 2014). However, if we assume that weight effects on judgements reflect real cognitive changes in a domain, the present findings will be noteworthy regarding potential therapeutic applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%