2017
DOI: 10.1113/jp275132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosing hidden information in the electroencephalogram using advanced signal analytical techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the output of the algorithm, we calculated the event-triggered average: (ie, the average of all segments of one signal aligned to the time of events in another signal) of 50 random examples of strong SWDs (distance to support vector of >1 to 2), moderate SWDs (>0.5 to 1), weak SWDs (>0 to 0.5), weak nonSWDs (<0 to −0.5), moderate nonSWDs (<−0.5 to −1), and strong non-SWDs (<−1 to −2), and 50 random locations not identified by our algorithm to delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (6-9 Hz), sigma (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and gamma (25-100 Hz) power surrounding each event during lights-on and lights-off periods. Using the output of the algorithm, we calculated the event-triggered average: (ie, the average of all segments of one signal aligned to the time of events in another signal) of 50 random examples of strong SWDs (distance to support vector of >1 to 2), moderate SWDs (>0.5 to 1), weak SWDs (>0 to 0.5), weak nonSWDs (<0 to −0.5), moderate nonSWDs (<−0.5 to −1), and strong non-SWDs (<−1 to −2), and 50 random locations not identified by our algorithm to delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (6-9 Hz), sigma (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and gamma (25-100 Hz) power surrounding each event during lights-on and lights-off periods.…”
Section: Application Of the Algorithm And Preliminary Testing Of Thmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the output of the algorithm, we calculated the event-triggered average: (ie, the average of all segments of one signal aligned to the time of events in another signal) of 50 random examples of strong SWDs (distance to support vector of >1 to 2), moderate SWDs (>0.5 to 1), weak SWDs (>0 to 0.5), weak nonSWDs (<0 to −0.5), moderate nonSWDs (<−0.5 to −1), and strong non-SWDs (<−1 to −2), and 50 random locations not identified by our algorithm to delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (6-9 Hz), sigma (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and gamma (25-100 Hz) power surrounding each event during lights-on and lights-off periods. Using the output of the algorithm, we calculated the event-triggered average: (ie, the average of all segments of one signal aligned to the time of events in another signal) of 50 random examples of strong SWDs (distance to support vector of >1 to 2), moderate SWDs (>0.5 to 1), weak SWDs (>0 to 0.5), weak nonSWDs (<0 to −0.5), moderate nonSWDs (<−0.5 to −1), and strong non-SWDs (<−1 to −2), and 50 random locations not identified by our algorithm to delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (6-9 Hz), sigma (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and gamma (25-100 Hz) power surrounding each event during lights-on and lights-off periods.…”
Section: Application Of the Algorithm And Preliminary Testing Of Thmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, the definition of "epileptiform" is often vague [10][11][12] and is subject to disagreement. In addition, many electrographic features appear hidden in the time domain 14 and thus may be difficult to detect via visual inspection of EEG records. In addition, many electrographic features appear hidden in the time domain 14 and thus may be difficult to detect via visual inspection of EEG records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinicians and researchers typically use subjective criteria, such as that an event 'stands out of the background' 13 , to force events into binary categories. Additionally, many electrographic features appear hidden in the time domain 14 and thus may be difficult to detect via visual inspection of EEG records. As we show, events can appear ambiguous to the same expert scorer such that, on repeated presentations, a scorer changes their mind about an event's categorization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%