2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00569.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosing clinical adverse events to patients: can practice inform policy?

Abstract: Objectives To understand patientsÕ and health professionalsÕ experience of Open Disclosure and how practice can inform policy.Background Open Disclosure procedures are being implemented in health services worldwide yet empirical evidence on which to base models of patient-clinician communication and policy development is scant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a topic of communication that has not been systematically researched (Sorensen et al, 2010). We sought to unpack the specific communication behaviors that differentiate effective and ineffective open disclosure interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a topic of communication that has not been systematically researched (Sorensen et al, 2010). We sought to unpack the specific communication behaviors that differentiate effective and ineffective open disclosure interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 According to the disclosure of medical error policies, errors must be revealed to patients and their families; however, policymaking is extremely difficult in health care due to health care organizations' obligation toward patient-centered practice; adding patients' needs is a major part of creating health policy objectives. 3 During the mid-1980s, a full-disclosure policy was implemented in the US, following major harm cases; several health care organizations followed the same lead. 3 Furthermore, the National Patient Safety Foundation announced a report stating, When a health care injury occurs, the patient and the family or representative are entailed to a prompt explanation of how the injury occurred and long-term effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the managerial model and the legal model have a naïve understanding of the function and nature of dissatisfaction and how it is expressed. They pay lip service to patients' needs but do not fit well in this particular health care sector, where patients are residents and receive long-term care in a social setting [26]. National health care policies should leave more room for sector specific adaptations, especially where the informal complaint trajectories are concerned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%