Discipline, debt and coercive commodification: Post-crisis neoliberalism and the welfare state in Ireland, the UK and the USA

Abstract

Ireland, the UK and the USA are heterogeneous examples of liberal worlds of welfare capitalism yet all three countries were deeply implicated in the 2008 global financial crisis. Examining these three countries together provides the opportunity to further develop an international comparative political economy of instability in the context of the globalised and financialised dimensions of Anglo-liberal capitalism and disciplinary governance. Our analysis is guided by the concept of disciplinary neoliberalism (Gill, 1995) through which we explore: (i) the dynamics that have shaped the impacts of and responses to the Great Recession; (ii) the ways in which state-market relations, shaped by differentiated accommodations to market imperative or market discipline, have been used as disciplinary tools and how these have interacted with existing social divisions and iii) the implications for shaping conditions for resistance. We suggest that the neoliberal pathways of each country, whilst not

Revisiting ‘The Birth of Biopolitics’: Foucault's Account of Neoliberalism and the Remaking of Social Policy

“…Such absences, in fact, are a ‘perennial limitation’ of his work (Brown, 2015: 73–74). In contrast, a good deal of current analysis within the field of social policy explores such forces of resistance (Dukelow and Kennett, 2018; Gruegel and Riggirozzi, 2018; Ishkanian and Glasius, 2018; Papadopoulous and Roumpakis, 2018; Schram and Pavlovskaya, 2017).…”

“…According to David Harvey (2005: 168) – arguably the leading populariser of the term – neoliberalism seeks to succeed the ‘embedded liberalism’ mostly dominant in the industrial west from the end of the Second World War into the 1970s. More recently, when examining developments in various parts of the world, a range of social policy scholars have continued to stress the significance of neoliberalism in examining the imposition of, and opposition to, a range of orientations and programmes (see, for example, Dukelow and Kennett, 2018; Grugel and Riggirozzi, 2018; Papadopoulos and Roumpakis, 2018; Schram and Pavlovskaya, 2017).…”

Recommodification and the Welfare State in Re/Financialised Austerity Capitalism: Further Eroding Social Citizenship?

“…Offe elaborated on this point with reference to human capital measures such as education and training. It is now clear, however, that 'administrative recommodification' must conceivably include disciplinary forms of active labour market policy (Greer, 2016;Dukelow and Kennett, 2018) which involve greater use of coercive power by the state.…”

“…In-work at-risk-of-poverty rate Source: Eurostat (2020) Figure 7. In-work at-risk-of-poverty rate for temporary employees Source: Eurostat (2020) activation measures that have become increasingly demanding, they constitute forms of 'coercive commodification' (Dukelow and Kennett, 2018), compelling individuals to re-integrate with the labour market. Consequently, state disciplinary forms of out-of-work recommodification twin with the market disciplinary effects of in-work recommodification.…”

Social work and neoliberalism: the Trondheim papers

“…There are 2.8 million people living in poverty in families where all adults work full time. (Alston, 2018, p. 17; see also Dukelow & Kennett, 2018) Readers of the UN report are presented with a striking tableau of a country in which there has been an immense growth in foodbanks and the queues waiting outside them, the people sleeping rough in the streets, the growth of homelessness, the sense of deep despair that leads even the Government to appoint a Minister for suicide prevention and civil society to report in depth on unheard of levels of loneliness and isolation. (Alston, 2018, p. 1) This is also an economic and social landscape in which the social work profession is charged with promoting the 'empowerment and liberation of people' with the principle of 'social justice' being foregrounded (International Federation of Social Workers, 2014; see also Hyslop, 2016Hyslop, , 2018.…”