Disciplinary perspectives on feedback processes: towards signature feedback practices

Abstract

Feedback processes are situated within the norms and practices of disciplinary learning activities. Through a sociocultural lens, this study seeks to understand disciplinary feedback possibilities and challenges through a study of four different disciplines at a research-intensive English medium university. Two soft applied and two hard applied disciplines were selected: architecture, education, engineering and medicine. Research methods comprised interviews with teachers and students, and carefully chosen classroom observations. The findings exemplify both disciplinary-specific and generic ways of implementing feedback processes, with critical reviews in architecture and bedside rounds in medicine representing significant disciplinary feedback practices. A contribution of the paper lies in suggesting a novel concept of signature feedback practices to denote characteristic feedback strategies used in specific disciplines. A key implication for practice lies in the potential for the development of signature feedback practices focused on ways of thinking and doing which are authentic to the discipline.

A Journey towards Collaborative Culture Development: How to Be Weightless Despite Academic Gravity

“…To manage the potential subjectivity and safeguard the reliability of the data collection and analysis processes, the authors had prolonged engagement with the data over time, as well as critical, reflexive discussions on how the data should be interpreted. However, it should be acknowledged that although the authors have strived to present a holistic picture of Author 1's personal experience in this article, similar to all qualitative research, it constitutes the researchers' interpretations (Carless et al, 2020). To enhance the trustworthiness of their interpretations of the data, triangulation between the meeting minutes, email communication records and documentation was conducted.…”

The effects of online peer-facilitated learning and distributed pair programming on students’ learning

“…In addition, through the mentorship in peer-facilitated collaborative learning, students could benefit by improving their involvement ( Croft & Lozada, 2020 ), motivation ( Lowell et al, 2022 ) and increasing their sense of belonging on campus ( Croft & Lozada, 2020 ). The collaboration and feedback could be beneficial for students’ development in programming ( Carless et al,2023 ).…”

Investigating Teacher–Teacher Feedback: Uncovering Useful Socio-pedagogical Norms for Reform-Based Chemistry Instruction

“…The context of the VCI-2 consisted of teachers providing feedback to their peers on two separate occasions. However, as recent studies have shown, ,, exploring the dialogic nature (e.g., when teachers engage in further conversation about the feedback with each other) may be promising.…”

“…Teachers typically overemphasize classroom management throughout their suggestions to each other . Carless et al recently noted that feedback being too generic is also problematic because effective implementation often fails when it is not focused on discipline-specific customs and procedures. For example, feedback in engineering instruction is inherently different than that associated with teaching medicine or art .…”