2020
DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2020.1753671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disciplinary disparities by race and disability: using DisCrit theory to examine the manifestation determination review process in special education in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There could be other variables, such as low levels of behavioral issues, that are affecting the relation between fidelity at Tier 2 and 3 and low levels of exclusionary discipline. Finally, this study did not account for SWPBIS FIDELITY & EXCLUSIONARY DISCIPLINE 20 how intersectional identities or other individual factors may impact exclusionary discipline for SWD (Fisher et al, 2021;Morgan et al, 2019). Previous studies have indicated that SWD, who are also members of culturally or linguistically diverse populations, may be more likely to receive exclusionary discipline (Losen, 2018;Losen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There could be other variables, such as low levels of behavioral issues, that are affecting the relation between fidelity at Tier 2 and 3 and low levels of exclusionary discipline. Finally, this study did not account for SWPBIS FIDELITY & EXCLUSIONARY DISCIPLINE 20 how intersectional identities or other individual factors may impact exclusionary discipline for SWD (Fisher et al, 2021;Morgan et al, 2019). Previous studies have indicated that SWD, who are also members of culturally or linguistically diverse populations, may be more likely to receive exclusionary discipline (Losen, 2018;Losen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Exclusionary discipline may be even more consequential for SWD as they lose access to important supports such as counselors, therapists, and special or individualized instruction, and making up missed instructional time may be more difficult (Losen & Martinez, 2020). Despite federal protections for SWD, such as manifest determination, the use of discriminatory discipline practices is an ongoing concern across districts and schools (Fisher et al, 2021). In response to these concerns, the federal government released new guidance for schools to support SWD and avoid discriminatory use of discipline in July 2022 (U.S. Department of Education, 2022a).…”
Section: Exclusionary Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing how ableism is collusive with racial and ethnic discrimination necessitates looking within and beyond constructs of dis/ability that are common in the United States. Considerable research using DisCrit has looked at the material impacts of how students of color are perceived and treated based on an institutionalized and deficit-based understanding of disability in schools (e.g., Annamma et al, 2014; Fisher et al, 2021). Such research often focuses on experiences of students in relation to the institutionalized practices of special education (i.e., students of color who take on school-based disability identities).…”
Section: Expanding the Use Of Discrit To The South Korean Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This often manifests in the form of negative feedback from audience members about structures that are perceived as feminine such as tag questions, or quotative like, or vocal fry. Like Figueroa and Gillion (2018) explain in the Vocal Fries podcast, once a structure is identified as femme, it doesn't matter that people who are masc also use it, the structure is considered deficient. The example they use in their 9/10/2018 podcast is Johnny Cash, a United States country singer from the mid to late 20th century.…”
Section: Gender In Language Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%