Disciplinary and institutional shifts: decomposing deviations in the country-level proportions of conference papers in Scopus

Kosyakov, Denis; Guskov, Andrey

doi:10.1007/s11192-024-04943-2

Scientometrics

2024

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-04943-2

|View full text |Cite

Disciplinary and institutional shifts: decomposing deviations in the country-level proportions of conference papers in Scopus

Denis Kosyakov,

Andrey Guskov

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Lead–lag effect of research between conference papers and journal papers in data mining

Huang,

Tian

2024

WIREs Data Min & Knowl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The examination of the lead–lag effect between different publication types, incorporating a temporal dimension, is very significant for assessing research. In this article, we introduce a novel framework to quantify the lead–lag effect between the research topics of conference papers and journal papers. We first identify research topics via the text‐embedding‐based topic modeling technique BERTopic, then extract the research topics of each time slice, construct and visualize the similarity matrix of topics to reveal the time‐lag direction and finally quantify the lead–lag effect by four proposed indicators, as well as by average influence topic similarity comparison maps. We conduct a detailed analysis of 19,166 bibliographic data for top conference papers and journal papers from 2015 to 2019 in the data mining field, calculate the similarity of topics obtained by BERTopic between each time slice divided by quarters. The results show that journal paper topics lag behind conference paper topics in the data mining field. The most significant lead–lag effect is 2.5 years, with approximately 33.45% of topics affected by this lag. The methodology presented here holds potential for broader application in the analysis of lead–lag effects across diverse research areas, offering valuable insights into the state of research development and informing policy decisions.This article is categorized under: Application Areas > Science and Technology

show abstract

Lead–lag effect of research between conference papers and journal papers in data mining

Huang,

Tian

2024

WIREs Data Min & Knowl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Do conference-journal articles receive more citations? A case study in physics

Wu,

Wang,

et al. 2024

Journal of Informetrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Disciplinary and institutional shifts: decomposing deviations in the country-level proportions of conference papers in Scopus

Cited by 2 publications

References 38 publications

Lead–lag effect of research between conference papers and journal papers in data mining

Lead–lag effect of research between conference papers and journal papers in data mining

Do conference-journal articles receive more citations? A case study in physics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About