1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-980x(98)00012-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discharge pattern of human motor units during dynamic concentric and eccentric contractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
62
0
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
62
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in discharge rate likely includes an increased variability in discharge (12,23,29,30), which can decrease twitch fusion and increase the fluctuations in the forces exerted by individual motor units (12,14). Some evidence indicates that discharge rate variability of the motor units and fluctuations in motor output increase with movement speed for both concentric (40,41) and eccentric contractions (22). Therefore, the greater relative increase in acceleration fluctuations during the eccentric contractions may be due to increased discharge rate variability of the involved motor units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in discharge rate likely includes an increased variability in discharge (12,23,29,30), which can decrease twitch fusion and increase the fluctuations in the forces exerted by individual motor units (12,14). Some evidence indicates that discharge rate variability of the motor units and fluctuations in motor output increase with movement speed for both concentric (40,41) and eccentric contractions (22). Therefore, the greater relative increase in acceleration fluctuations during the eccentric contractions may be due to increased discharge rate variability of the involved motor units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both force release and lengthening contractions control the force output during detachment of crossbridges. The force output likely results from the detachment of crossbridges, which explains the decreased activation of muscle relative to force increase or shortening contractions (reduced active formation of crossbridges) (Burnett et al 2000;Christou and Tracy 2005;Kossev and Christova 1998;Laidlaw et al 2000;Nardone and Schieppati 1988). A robust feature of the muscle activation during lengthening contractions is the decrease in the discharge rate of motor units (Kossev and Christova 1998;Laidlaw et al 2000).…”
Section: Phase and Force Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it has been suggested that the frequency content of the MMG signal may qualitatively reflect the global firing rate of the unfused activated motor units (Orizio 1993;Bichler 2000;Akataki et al 2001Akataki et al , 2003Bichler and Celichowski 2001;Orizio et al 2003). Thus, simultaneous examination of the time and frequency domains of the MMG signal may provide information regarding the unique motor control strategies (recruitment and firing rate) that modulate force production in various muscles (Orizio et al 1989(Orizio et al , 1990Zhang et al 1992;Kossev and Christova 1998;Shinohara et al 1998;Madeleine et al 2001;Linnamo et al 2003;Akataki et al 2003).…”
Section: Mechanomyographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it has been shown that MMG amplitude is related to motor unit recruitment, while the frequency domain may provide information regarding motor unit firing rate (Orizio 1993;Orizio et al 2003). Thus, simultaneous examination of the time and frequency domains of the MMG signal may be useful for describing the differences that exist in the motor control strategies that modulate force production during isometric versus dynamic muscle actions (Kossev and Christova 1998;Linnamo et al 2003). No studies, however, have examined the MMG and EMG responses during submaximal to maximal, isokinetic muscle actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%