2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2613-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disaster prediction model based on support vector machine for regression and improved differential evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recently, ML approaches have achieved fairly good results in various natural hazard susceptibility mapping studies. Some common ML approaches were applied in a wide range of studies in the field of wildfire modelling and susceptibility mapping such as an artificial neural network (ANN) [17], support vector machines (SVM) [18][19][20], and random forest (RF) [21,22], all three of which we evaluated in this study for the spatial prediction of wildfire susceptibility. We used the capabilities of these three ML approaches using sixteen wildfire conditioning factors based on five main factors-topographic, meteorological, anthropological, vegetation, and hydrological.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recently, ML approaches have achieved fairly good results in various natural hazard susceptibility mapping studies. Some common ML approaches were applied in a wide range of studies in the field of wildfire modelling and susceptibility mapping such as an artificial neural network (ANN) [17], support vector machines (SVM) [18][19][20], and random forest (RF) [21,22], all three of which we evaluated in this study for the spatial prediction of wildfire susceptibility. We used the capabilities of these three ML approaches using sixteen wildfire conditioning factors based on five main factors-topographic, meteorological, anthropological, vegetation, and hydrological.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection operation generates the next generation population by comparing the fitness values between the current evolutionary individuals and the trial individuals. Although it is simple and has few control parameters, DE has good convergence and has been successfully applied in many scientific and engineering fields (Cavalini et al, 2016;Dhaliwal, 2017;Panigrahi, 2017;Yu, 2017;Zhao et al, 2015). The operation process about the standard differential evolution will be described as follows.…”
Section: Differential Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…represent mutually exclusive indices [39,40]. F shows the mutation scale factor that controls the amplification of DE [36].…”
Section: Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%