2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disassembly and rewiring of a mature converging excitatory circuit following injury

Abstract: Highlights d Upon injury, RGC dendrites lose presynaptic inputs before postsynaptic sites d Synapse loss is biased among presynaptic types, skewed against major partners d Reconnection with former developmental partners occurs in the adult circuit d Rewiring occurs at the expense of convergence, preventing functional recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, other authors have characterized the presence of calbindin expressed in ONs-αRGCs (in addition to the labeling of a subpopulation of amacrine cells; Krieger et al, 2017 ; Sonoda et al, 2020 ) which, when colocalized with an αRGC pan-marker, allows for reliable detection of ONs-αRGCs. Previous studies have documented that these M4-ipRGCs (ONs-αRGCs) are more resistant to retinal injury (El-Danaf and Huberman, 2015 ; Ou et al, 2016 ; Tran et al, 2019 ), due to their ability to alter their synaptic connectivity pattern after injury to promote survival (Della Santina et al, 2021 ). However, there is not a complete consensus on this characteristic, as in other studies, M4-ipRGCs have not been more resistant than the rest of the RGCs (Gallego-Ortega et al, 2021 ; Gao et al, 2022 ), reviewed in Tran et al ( 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, other authors have characterized the presence of calbindin expressed in ONs-αRGCs (in addition to the labeling of a subpopulation of amacrine cells; Krieger et al, 2017 ; Sonoda et al, 2020 ) which, when colocalized with an αRGC pan-marker, allows for reliable detection of ONs-αRGCs. Previous studies have documented that these M4-ipRGCs (ONs-αRGCs) are more resistant to retinal injury (El-Danaf and Huberman, 2015 ; Ou et al, 2016 ; Tran et al, 2019 ), due to their ability to alter their synaptic connectivity pattern after injury to promote survival (Della Santina et al, 2021 ). However, there is not a complete consensus on this characteristic, as in other studies, M4-ipRGCs have not been more resistant than the rest of the RGCs (Gallego-Ortega et al, 2021 ; Gao et al, 2022 ), reviewed in Tran et al ( 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in synaptic plasticity is conducive to optimizing the neural network and the maturity of brain function. It is crucial for stem cell-based therapies to restore functional recovery [38]. Our study shows that NSCs intranasal delivery plays a positive role in promoting the regulation of plasticity and stability, and the reduction in BNE may be an important indicator of the function improvement of the cerebral network in patients with CP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Next, we studied the integrity of ON vs. OFF bipolar cell axons following glaucoma-like injury. Immunostaining against Sty2, which labels the axon terminals of type 2 and 6 bipolar cells ( 20 ), has verified the preservation of type 6 ON bipolar cell axons but OFF axons remain obscure ( 62 ). We distinguished the ON and OFF bipolar cells by the IPL depth of axon terminals, quantifying the entire population in the same wholemounts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%