2005
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disagreements between disc diffusion, and MIC-based susceptibility categorizations of ertapenem versus ESBL producers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broth microdilution (BMD) is a well-established, standard method, but it is too laborintensive for use in clinical laboratories (Versalovic et al, 2011;Garcia and Isenberg, 2010). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for ertapenem can be performed using all of the above methods; however, many laboratories lack the essential experience to do so, and there is little data comparing the efficacies of the different methods (Pailhories et al, 2014;Samuel et al, 2005;Vading et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broth microdilution (BMD) is a well-established, standard method, but it is too laborintensive for use in clinical laboratories (Versalovic et al, 2011;Garcia and Isenberg, 2010). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for ertapenem can be performed using all of the above methods; however, many laboratories lack the essential experience to do so, and there is little data comparing the efficacies of the different methods (Pailhories et al, 2014;Samuel et al, 2005;Vading et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%