Disagreement between subjective and actigraphic measures of sleep duration in a population‐based study of elderly persons*

Abstract

Summary Sleep duration is an important concept in epidemiological studies. It characterizes a night’s sleep or a person’s sleep pattern, and is associated with numerous health outcomes. In most large studies, sleep duration is assessed with questionnaires or sleep diaries. As an alternative, actigraphy may be used, as it objectively measures sleep parameters and is feasible in large studies. However, actigraphy and sleep diaries may not measure exactly the same phenomenon. Our study aims to determine disagreement between actigraphic and diary estimates of sleep duration, and to investigate possible determinants of this disagreement. This investigation was embedded in the population‐based Rotterdam Study. The study population consisted of 969 community‐dwelling participants aged 57–97 years. Participants wore an actigraph and kept a sleep diary for, on average, six consecutive nights. Both measures were used to determine total sleep time (TST). In 34% of the participants, the estimated TST in the sleep diaries deviated more than 1 h from actigraphically measured TST. The level of disagreement between diary and actigraphic measures decreased with subjective and actigraphic measures of sleep quality, and increased with male gender, poor cognitive function and functional disability. Actigraphically measured poor sleep was often accompanied by longer subjective estimates of TST, whereas subjectively poor sleepers tended to report shorter TST in their diaries than was measured with actigraphy. We recommend, whenever possible, to use multiple measures of sleep duration, to perform analyses with both, and to examine the consistency of the results over assessment methods.

Sleep Duration in Relation to Cognitive Function among Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

“…Of studies that identified an association between extreme sleep durations and worse cognitive function, each ascertained subjective sleep duration via participant self report. This is interesting, considering the fact that previous studies have reported a discrepancy between subjective vs. objective assessments of sleep duration; indeed, there is some indication that older adults with perceived or actual problems with sleep quality may report more extreme sleep durations [44,81] . A minority of studies in this review considered sleep-related variables other than sleep duration (i.e.…”

The Association between Job Related Factors, Short Sleep and Obesity

“…While there is evidence that self-reported mass may be underestimated, they are not considered significant enough to affect the results 32) . Self-reported sleep length and actigraphic sleep recordings have been shown to be well correlated 33) but it is the case that the accuracy depends on the cognitive and functional abilities of participants 34) Third, it may be the case that other confounders were present that we could not control (eg. energy intake and physical activity).…”

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Chronic Insomnia in Adults Older than 75 Years: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Clinical Trial

“…The use of PSG should be considered, because participants with insomnia often misestimate their actual sleep status. 65,66 However, in consideration of the cost of polysomnography, and the additional burden for the enrolled elderly, we chose not to use PSG. A second limitation is the lack of follow-up durations and the small sample size.…”