Disadvantaged populations in maternal health in China who and why?

Abstract

BackgroundChina has made impressive progress towards the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) for maternal and reproductive health, but ensuring that progress reaches all segments of the population remains a challenge for policy makers. The aim of this review is to map disadvantaged populations in terms of maternal health in China, and to explain the causes of these inequities to promote policy action.MethodsWe searched PUBMED, Popline, Proquest and WanFang and included primary studies conducted in mainland China. Experts were also contacted to identify additional studies. Disadvantaged populations in terms of MDG 5 and the reasons for this disadvantage explored by authors were identified and coded based on the conceptual framework developed by the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health.ResultsIn China, differences in maternal health service utilization and the maternal mortality ratio among different income groups, and among regions with different socio-economic development still exist, although these differences are narrowing. Groups with low levels of education and ethnic minorities utilize maternal health care less frequently and experience higher maternal mortality, although we could not determine whether these differences have changed in the last decade. Rural-to-urban migrants use maternal health care and contraception to a lower extent than permanent residents of cities, and differential maternal mortality shows a widening trend among these groups. Gender inequity also contributes to the disadvantaged position of women. Intermediary factors that explain these inequities include material circumstances such as long distances to health facilities for women living in remote areas, behavioral factors such as traditional beliefs that result in reduced care seeking among ethnic minorities, and health system determinants such as out-of-pocket payments posing financial barriers for the poor.ConclusionsInequity in maternal health continues to be an issue worthy of greater programmatic and monitoring efforts in China.

Status of Maternal Mortality in Zambia: Use of Routine Data

“…This geographical variation may be related to the different socio-economic, demographic and environmental features in the provinces. Our findings on the differentials in maternal mortality within countries are in accord with the published literature (Bomela, 2015;Yuan et al 2013;Hogan et al, 2010).…”

Cervical and breast cancer screening participation and utilisation of maternal health services: a cross-sectional study among immigrant women in Southern Italy

“…19 But the benefits of these have not extended everywhere and to everyone, since significant disparities by race and ethnicity persist. Studies on the determinants of maternal healthcare delivery suggest that social, economic, behavioural and environmental factors explain the worse outcomes among migrants [20][21][22][23] in terms of preterm delivery, congenital anomalies, low birth weight, fetal growth restriction and infant mortality 24-26 when compared with the native population. 27 In Italy, both native and foreign women have the right to participate free of charge in a specific programme of care during pregnancy and up to 1 month following delivery.…”

“…results Rate of cervical CS among the 419 eligible women was low (39.1%), and about one-third had had a Pap test for screening purposes within a 3-year period from interview (32.8%). Regarding breast CS practices, of the 125 eligible women 45.6% had had a mammography for control purposes and less than a quarter (26,20.8%) had their mammography within the recommended time interval of 2 years. About 80% of the respondents did not report difficulties of access and use of antenatal and postpartum services.…”

Beyond 2015: time to reposition Scandinavia in global health?

“…Associated capacity development issues in the field of social determinants are reflected in the context of the EU INTREC training initiative (8). Action implications from findings on inequity in China are discussed by Yuan and colleagues (9). …”