1987
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.32.4.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disabling language and attitudes toward persons with disabilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that psychiatric labeling did not have a major influence on attitudes towards people with schizophrenia when the symptoms of schizophrenia were presented. The finding was consistent with our hypothesis and agreed with studies on people with physical disabilities, which showed that politically correct descriptors such as ‘person with a physical disability’ did not improve attitudes relative to less ‘correct’ terms such as ‘a disabled person’ 29,30 . We have no data regarding the impact of the new program that uses the term s i‐jue‐shi‐diao for publicity on attitudes towards mental illness and schizophrenia among Hong Kong Chinese.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We showed that psychiatric labeling did not have a major influence on attitudes towards people with schizophrenia when the symptoms of schizophrenia were presented. The finding was consistent with our hypothesis and agreed with studies on people with physical disabilities, which showed that politically correct descriptors such as ‘person with a physical disability’ did not improve attitudes relative to less ‘correct’ terms such as ‘a disabled person’ 29,30 . We have no data regarding the impact of the new program that uses the term s i‐jue‐shi‐diao for publicity on attitudes towards mental illness and schizophrenia among Hong Kong Chinese.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…First, the items of both scales were rephrased to refer specifically to physical disability rather than disability in general. Second, as suggested by Patterson and Witten (1987), Lynch et al. (1994) and Gouvier et al.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, despite the intuitive appeal of using benign labels to reduce stigma, there is no empirical evidence that politically correct labels affect attitudes toward persons with schizophrenia or other severe mental illnesses. In the area of physical disabilities, it was found that “nondisabling” descriptors (i.e., “person with a physical disability”) did not improve attitudes relative to more “disabling” descriptors (i.e., “a disabled person”) (Patterson and Witten 1987; Millington and Leirer 1996; Gouvier et al 1997). Therefore, it is possible that mental health professionals and community members are adopting labels to describe persons with schizophrenia that may not reduce stigma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%