The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1411251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disabled academics: a case study in Canadian universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, in the USA and UK at least, the marketisation of higher education (Cribb and Gewirtz 2013; Martin 2016) creates a targetdriven culture where departments rely on their ability to recruit students, to gain high scores on 'student satisfaction', and simultaneously to produce academic papers which are graded by panels of 'experts' in order to reward those institutions where research excellence is demonstrable. In that culture of commodification, it is maybe unsurprising that the experiences of disabled staff within universities have generally been shown by research to be problematic (Brewster et al 2017;Brown and Leigh 2018;Corlett and Williams 2011;Inckle 2018;Waterfield et al 2018;Williams 2011). Despite some positive 'coping strategies' reported, a dominant theme is the normative 'ableism' which is embedded unconsciously in the academy, from recruitment practices (Chan 2005) to physical access (Titchkosky 2008), and the pressure placed on disabled academics (Raymaker 2017).…”
Section: Disability In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, in the USA and UK at least, the marketisation of higher education (Cribb and Gewirtz 2013; Martin 2016) creates a targetdriven culture where departments rely on their ability to recruit students, to gain high scores on 'student satisfaction', and simultaneously to produce academic papers which are graded by panels of 'experts' in order to reward those institutions where research excellence is demonstrable. In that culture of commodification, it is maybe unsurprising that the experiences of disabled staff within universities have generally been shown by research to be problematic (Brewster et al 2017;Brown and Leigh 2018;Corlett and Williams 2011;Inckle 2018;Waterfield et al 2018;Williams 2011). Despite some positive 'coping strategies' reported, a dominant theme is the normative 'ableism' which is embedded unconsciously in the academy, from recruitment practices (Chan 2005) to physical access (Titchkosky 2008), and the pressure placed on disabled academics (Raymaker 2017).…”
Section: Disability In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student learning is driven by mental strength. Mental strength is in the form of desires and attention, sometimes there are desires that activate, move, channel and direct the attitudes and behavior of individuals in learning [24]. Discipline of students, timeliness of class entry is very good, this is due to supporting factors from parents.…”
Section: Table II Observation Results Learning Difficulties Aspects mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, maintaining a high level of outputs, such as publishing first-author papers, is necessary to be competitive in grant acquisition. If a researcher cannot sustain funding, staff cannot be retained to continue research and further drops in productivity ensue [4]. This is a vicious cycle for disabled scholars.…”
Section: Disability and Discrimination In Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, discrimination is not overt or even intentional but based on the shared expectation of normality and a culture of ableism. Disabled academics, from their perspective, may feel misunderstood or undervalued [1] or may not realize they have a right to identify as disabled or neurodiverse [4].…”
Section: Disability and Discrimination In Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%