2013
DOI: 10.1108/s1479-3547(2013)0000007013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability, gender and caste intersections in Indian economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of multiple marginalities such as membership of an excluded social group or having female gender and low education status adding to the disadvantage of disability has been identified as a basis for additional exclusion of those with PSD. 28 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of multiple marginalities such as membership of an excluded social group or having female gender and low education status adding to the disadvantage of disability has been identified as a basis for additional exclusion of those with PSD. 28 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the outset of this study, we hypothesized that women who were both disabled and Dalit would be doubly discriminated against. This was based on studies that state women with multiple vulnerabilities may face compounded discriminations [41]. Significantly however, this study found disability far outweighed class as a daily concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…People with disabilities in India are marginalised in education, employment, mobility, and other significant life areas (Mehrotra 2013). Ghai (2015) describes the common cultural perception in India as being that disability is retribution for past karma from which there can be no reprieve.…”
Section: Disability Experience In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies designed to address material disadvantage facing members of religious minorities are yet to achieve any level of success, and can be regarded as politically expedient tokenism as opposed to genuine efforts to address socioeconomic inequalities that exist along religious lines (M.S. (Mehrotra 2013).…”
Section: Religious Minority Experience In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%