2004
DOI: 10.1080/0267303042000249189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
105
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Imrie and Edwards (2007: 626) conceptualised this as the 'recursive relationship between identity and space'. Imrie's (2004) study of accessible housing offers an example, recognising the 'importance of embodiment in influencing people's experiences of, and meanings attributed to, home' (41), concluding that impairment does not 'acquire meaning of function independent from social context or setting' (ibid.). Both embodiment and home become what they are through the active inter-relationality of embodied and emotional actions, intentions and desires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imrie and Edwards (2007: 626) conceptualised this as the 'recursive relationship between identity and space'. Imrie's (2004) study of accessible housing offers an example, recognising the 'importance of embodiment in influencing people's experiences of, and meanings attributed to, home' (41), concluding that impairment does not 'acquire meaning of function independent from social context or setting' (ibid.). Both embodiment and home become what they are through the active inter-relationality of embodied and emotional actions, intentions and desires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the social and medical model, scholars working from an embodied approach emphasize the bodily differences of disabilities and impairments, which are important since not only do different people experience different disabilities differently, but people may experience what is often seen as 'the same' disability differently (Imrie 2004), and that experiences, problems and needs may vary between individuals and across gender, age and other intersectionalities.…”
Section: Disability and Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this research highlights the social and material barriers which discriminate and exclude disabled people in organizational life, it has not made us understand deeper the contributions of disabled people in organizations and how they could be considered as providing value to organizations. The very focus of these studies on adjustment of the environment risk to undermine a view on disabled employees as resources and instead tend to emphasize disabled employees as 'a problem to be solved' or passive victims (Allen, Milner, and Price, 2002;Imrie 2004), which also fosters a negative view on disabled employees due to the costs incurred when employing a person with disability. The social model also completely ignores the lived experiences of disabled people and the bodily aspects of disability, and instead assumes that problems of disability are entirely socially constructed (Hughes and Paterson 1997).…”
Section: Disability and Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of more critical accounts of home, a more realistic picture of home life has now been painted which better reflects processes of exchange, negotiation and conflict which make up domestic life (Brickell 2012). Going further, for some individuals, for example for those suffering domestic violence or for disabled people in unsuitable properties, the home can be a place of danger (Imrie 2004).…”
Section: What Is a Home?mentioning
confidence: 99%