1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02045.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism

Abstract: This article critiques the assumptions about the nature and meaning of disability advanced in social‐psychological writing, suggests the origins of these assumptions, and proposes a return to a Lewinian/minority‐group analysis of the situation of people with disabilities. It concludes by placing the articles in this issue of the Journal of Social Issues in context and by presenting questions in need of further exploration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
242
0
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
242
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporating multiculturalism and diversity into the educational process has become a major challenge not only for individual educators and supervisors but for the entire educational system as well. There is little doubt that the curriculum of psychology is woefully inadequate in its coverage of racial and ethnic minorities, women, sexual minorities, and the disabled (Chin & Russo, 1998;Conti & Kimmel, 1993;Fine & Asch, 1988;Madden & Hyde, 1998;Simoni, 1996). As a result there is the danger that culturally different students may feel oppressed and alienated or may develop a perspective that evaluates their own cultural group, gender, or sexual orientation as being less than desirable (Highlen, 1994; D. W. Sue & Sue, 1999).…”
Section: Theme Five: Teaching Multiculturalism and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating multiculturalism and diversity into the educational process has become a major challenge not only for individual educators and supervisors but for the entire educational system as well. There is little doubt that the curriculum of psychology is woefully inadequate in its coverage of racial and ethnic minorities, women, sexual minorities, and the disabled (Chin & Russo, 1998;Conti & Kimmel, 1993;Fine & Asch, 1988;Madden & Hyde, 1998;Simoni, 1996). As a result there is the danger that culturally different students may feel oppressed and alienated or may develop a perspective that evaluates their own cultural group, gender, or sexual orientation as being less than desirable (Highlen, 1994; D. W. Sue & Sue, 1999).…”
Section: Theme Five: Teaching Multiculturalism and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stigma as a conceptual tool has been used since Goffman's study by researchers to examine the exclusion of a wide range of social groups labelled as other and treated as tainted by those who are 'normal', perhaps most extensively in relation to mental illness (Corrigan, Markowitz, and Watson 2004;Dinos et al 2004;Rüsch, Angermeyer, and Corrigan 2005), HIV/AIDS (Castro and Farmer 2005;Parker and Aggleton 2003;Alonzo and Reynolds 1995) and disability (Kleinman et al 1995;Schneider 1988;Fine and Asch 1988). Scholars have also looked at the stigmatisation of migrants, usually in receiving countries and usually those stigmatised not just because of their immigration status, but also because they are engaged in sex work (Lévy and Lieber 2008;Scambler 2007;Pheterson 1993) or HIV positive (Koku 2010).…”
Section: Stigma and Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the heart of this debate is the need to balance an individual's freedom to take risks with the need for enforced use of safety measures. As well, a question remains whether such a requirement would represent a form of discrimination against people with mobility impairments [24][25][26]. Such stigmatization may have a psychological impact on users and may lead to feelings of anxiety and depression, decreased device use and, ultimately, reduced participation in daily activity [27].…”
Section: Elements Of a Definition Of Safe Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%