2006
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500163794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability assessments: Effects of response mode and experience

Abstract: The results suggest that assessments of disability are largely based on the initial representation that is formed after reading the file. The main pitfall is that the final representation is based on general beliefs rather than on actual client information. For training and support this would mean that doctors should be made aware of the extent to which their assessment is anchored in the case at hand.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher proportion responded this in 2012 than in 2008. Our results are in line with studies of physicians from other specialties, showing that assessing the patient's work capacity is problematic in sickness certifications [21, 24]. This is an important area to highlight in further interventions aiming at improving competence and provide organizational support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A higher proportion responded this in 2012 than in 2008. Our results are in line with studies of physicians from other specialties, showing that assessing the patient's work capacity is problematic in sickness certifications [21, 24]. This is an important area to highlight in further interventions aiming at improving competence and provide organizational support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Critics across Europe have pointed to the lack of reliability and transparency in disability evaluation [1][2][3][4][5][6], with the heterogeneous presentation of findings in the medical reports being one of the reasons. When confronted with similar challenges a decade ago, the international rehabilitation community has started to picture the situation of people with disability by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These components are further subdivided in 1424 categories [8]. The ICF provides a common point of reference for conceptualizing disability [2] which may facilitate standardized reporting about work disability across countries [4,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems reported were related to handling disagreements with patients about the need of a sickness certification; decisions of whether to certify a prolongation of a sick-leave period that was initiated by another physician; assessments of a patient’s work ability; and determination of optimal duration and degree of certification [11-13]. Several other studies in different countries have reported similar findings [14-20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%