The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316104316.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability and Deformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 103 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essaka Joshua says, "Deformity was most commonly conceptualized as a set of characteristics that are the opposite of beauty. Philosophers of the period usually characterize deformity negatively, and standardize it as something that exhibits irregularity, disproportion, disharmony, asymmetry, peculiarity, sickness, and decay" [19]. This aesthetic philosophy plays a significant role in the stereotyping of disabled people as deviant, evil, ugly, deformed, incomplete, etc.…”
Section: Alienation Of People With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essaka Joshua says, "Deformity was most commonly conceptualized as a set of characteristics that are the opposite of beauty. Philosophers of the period usually characterize deformity negatively, and standardize it as something that exhibits irregularity, disproportion, disharmony, asymmetry, peculiarity, sickness, and decay" [19]. This aesthetic philosophy plays a significant role in the stereotyping of disabled people as deviant, evil, ugly, deformed, incomplete, etc.…”
Section: Alienation Of People With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%