1981
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Abstract: SUMMARY The nature of the neurological and mental disabilities resulting from severe head injuries are analysed in 150 patients. Mental handicap contributed more significantly to overall social disability than did neurological deficits. This social handicap is readily described by the Glasgow Outcome Scale, an extended version of which is described and compared with alternatives. Comments are made about the quality oflife in disabled survivors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
491
0
21

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,087 publications
(520 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
491
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…An original driver for the development of a robust outcome scale was the realization that multicentre studies of outcomes after coma were needed to address the issue of balancing reductions in mortality rate with survival and quality of life 7 . The GOS was, therefore, designed and published in this context.…”
Section: He Maintains That Claims About Remarkable Recoveries Aftermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An original driver for the development of a robust outcome scale was the realization that multicentre studies of outcomes after coma were needed to address the issue of balancing reductions in mortality rate with survival and quality of life 7 . The GOS was, therefore, designed and published in this context.…”
Section: He Maintains That Claims About Remarkable Recoveries Aftermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[H2] Dichotomization of outcomes Despite early criticism of the GOS for "over-compressing" survival outcome 7 , a convention developed for dichotomising the five-point GOS scale into 'unfavourable' (Dead, Vegetative or Severe Disability) or 'favourable' (Moderate Disability or Good Recovery) outcomes. This dichotomy reflects the view that independent function, rather than survival with disability that leaves patients dependent, is the desired outcome because head injury is most common among young adults.…”
Section: [H1] Criticismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jennett, Snoek, Bond & Brooks (1981) extended the GOS-E from five categories to eight categories which are: dead, vegetative state, lower severe disability, upper severe disability, lower moderate disability, upper moderate disability, lower good recovery and upper good recovery (Sander, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many consequences of TBI, persistent cognitive deficits, including impairments in memory and learning, are especially common and a major obstacle to functional recovery [40,64,69]. The specific neuropathological causes of the learning and memory impairments following TBI have been difficult to define because of the heterogeneity of the disorder, but damage to the temporal lobes, including the hippocampus is common [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%