Dış Ticaret Verileri İçin Kümeleme Analizi: Türkiye, Azerbaycan ve Kazakistan Örneği

Çilgin, Cihan; Kurt, A.

doi:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2021.02.24

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Karaalp (2011) analyzed Türkiye's competitiveness against CIS countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine) by using revealed comparative advantage index, intra-industry trade index and trade intensity index for 16 product groups for the period 1996-2008 and identified the sectors in which Türkiye has comparative advantage. Çılgın and Kurt (2021) applied cluster analysis with the 2017 foreign trade data of Türkiye, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan and identified the trade clusters of the countries. Balıkçıoğlu (2019) analyzed foreign trade relations between Türkiye and Turkic Republics in terms of direction, scale, and sectoral distribution of foreign trade for the period 2000-2017.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Türkiye Azerbaycan Ekonomik İlişkileri: İki Taraflı Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler Perspektifi

AKAY

2023

Politik Ekonomik Kuram

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Türkiye is attempting to strengthen its economic relations through regional and global cooperations. Türkiye desires to boost trade volume, diversify trade markets, and become a major player in the area through bilateral or multilateral collaboration with South Caucasus and Central Asian nations, with whom it shares linguistic and cultural affinities. After Azerbaijan declared its independence in 1991, Türkiye established economic relations with Azerbaijan and signed a Preferential Trade Agreement in 2020, in order to take the cooperation to a higher level. The economic relations of the two nations are analyzed in terms of international trade in this study, with the goal of increasing bilateral trade volume and liberalizing trade. Countries are assessed using fundamental macroeconomic variables, and their comparative advantages in bilateral trade are established. Using the bilateral revealed comparative advantage index, the study examined the nations' comparative advantages and export shares by product group. The findings of the study allow for a comparison of product groupings with comparative advantage with the products covered by the Preferential Trade Agreement, as well as a sense of the agreement's potential to enhance trade volume.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Türkiye Azerbaycan Ekonomik İlişkileri: İki Taraflı Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler Perspektifi

AKAY

2023

Politik Ekonomik Kuram

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Uluslararası Öğrenci Değerlendirme Programı skorlarına göre ülkelerin kümelenmesi

SÖZEN,

BULUT

2024

Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to cluster 65 countries based on PISA results. In the study, PISA results (Science-Mathematics-Reading) published by OECD in 2015 and 2018 were used. The main purpose of the analysis is to apply cluster analysis using a multivariate data structure to identify similarities and differences in education systems between countries. In this analysis, the k-means method and the hierarchical clustering algorithm were used to group countries into specific groups, so that countries with similar educational performance were included in the same cluster. In addition, Dunn, Connectivity and Silhouette indexes were used to increase the reliability of the analysis and to determine the optimal number of clusters. According to the validation indexes, k-means method with k=2 was used for 2015 PISA scores while hierarchical clustering algorithm with k=2 was used for 2018 PISA scores. In 2015, Turkey was the only country that changed clusters between the countries clustered according to their PISA scores and the countries clustered according to their PISA scores in 2018, and the reasons for this change were discussed. It is also observed that Turkey was in Cluster-1 in 2015, which includes countries with lower performance, and in Cluster-2 in 2018, which includes countries with higher performance. The clustering methods and indexes used provide a more robust and informed interpretation of the results obtained and make an important contribution to understanding the education systems of countries based on PISA results and grouping countries with similar performance.

show abstract

Dış Ticaret Verileri İçin Kümeleme Analizi: Türkiye, Azerbaycan ve Kazakistan Örneği

Cited by 2 publications

References 28 publications

Türkiye Azerbaycan Ekonomik İlişkileri: İki Taraflı Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler Perspektifi

Türkiye Azerbaycan Ekonomik İlişkileri: İki Taraflı Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler Perspektifi

Uluslararası Öğrenci Değerlendirme Programı skorlarına göre ülkelerin kümelenmesi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About