2015
DOI: 10.22403/uqroomx/typ17/05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directrices para la remediación de los suelos contaminados con hidrocarburos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In regards to the quantif ication of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (HTP), it was found that the control soil (T2) was not contaminated with hydrocarbons and, in the results of Tukey test for this parameter, T2 presents signif icant differences with respect to TR2 and TP2 (HSD > 33.4983), but no signif icant differences were observed when comparing the values of TR2 and TP2 (HSD < 33.4983); though, it should be noted that all values are below the MLP of Mexican regulations in matters of the hydrocarbons in soils (SEMARNAT, 2013). In similar studies, Khalladi et al (2009) and Chan-Quijano et al (2015) mentioned that surfactant treatment gave good results for soils contaminated with the light fraction of hydrocarbons. It has also been reported that this process has better selectivity in clay soils without presenting an increment in the formation of aggregates and textures (Li et al, 2016); nevertheless, there are some disadvantages for this method: for example, it promotes the removal of organic matter and when cationic surfactants are employed, the salt content is usually increased, if mixed surfactants are used, the dragging of other cations is promoted and the percentage of organic matter is decreased (Mao et al, 2015).…”
Section: Zonementioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In regards to the quantif ication of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (HTP), it was found that the control soil (T2) was not contaminated with hydrocarbons and, in the results of Tukey test for this parameter, T2 presents signif icant differences with respect to TR2 and TP2 (HSD > 33.4983), but no signif icant differences were observed when comparing the values of TR2 and TP2 (HSD < 33.4983); though, it should be noted that all values are below the MLP of Mexican regulations in matters of the hydrocarbons in soils (SEMARNAT, 2013). In similar studies, Khalladi et al (2009) and Chan-Quijano et al (2015) mentioned that surfactant treatment gave good results for soils contaminated with the light fraction of hydrocarbons. It has also been reported that this process has better selectivity in clay soils without presenting an increment in the formation of aggregates and textures (Li et al, 2016); nevertheless, there are some disadvantages for this method: for example, it promotes the removal of organic matter and when cationic surfactants are employed, the salt content is usually increased, if mixed surfactants are used, the dragging of other cations is promoted and the percentage of organic matter is decreased (Mao et al, 2015).…”
Section: Zonementioning
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, it is advisable to apply in the studied soil sowing techniques designed for urban and arid areas, for example, double digging or deep seeding, the latter is to leave the root as close to the water table in order to achieve a deeper anchorage and the plant does not have stress for lack of water; this methodology has also been successfully applied to restore underground aquifers and contaminated soils (Rahman and Hasegawa, 2011;Ukiwe et al, 2013;Chan-Quijano et al, 2015). Regarding the restoration of tropical areas, favorable results have been achieved with the use of plants with a small crown diameter and that can be managed by pruning.…”
Section: Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many researchers consider that bioremediation methods are superior to physical-chemical methods for cleanup of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil (see for example, [9,10]). Although physical-chemical treatments are widely used due to the short time required for the reduction of high hydrocarbons concentrations, many researchers have considered that the effects on soil fertility are very negative [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%