2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2019.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directorate interlocks and corporate cash holdings in emerging economies: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficients on cash holding and growth opportunities are still significant at the 1% level and have negative signs in all countries, same as the single‐equation results. These findings are similar to the results of existing studies on cash holdings (Brick & Liao, 2016) and growth opportunities (Barclay et al, 2003; Billett et al, 2007; Dang, 2011; Elyasiani et al, 2002; Johnson, 2003; Li et al, 2020). However, in contrast to the single‐equation result, the coefficient on the interaction term between growth opportunities and debt maturity (the proportion of long‐term debt) in all countries exhibits the positive sign.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The coefficients on cash holding and growth opportunities are still significant at the 1% level and have negative signs in all countries, same as the single‐equation results. These findings are similar to the results of existing studies on cash holdings (Brick & Liao, 2016) and growth opportunities (Barclay et al, 2003; Billett et al, 2007; Dang, 2011; Elyasiani et al, 2002; Johnson, 2003; Li et al, 2020). However, in contrast to the single‐equation result, the coefficient on the interaction term between growth opportunities and debt maturity (the proportion of long‐term debt) in all countries exhibits the positive sign.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Some studies identified corruption, country peculiarities and firm characteristics as the predictors of cash holding (Tran, 2019; and Li et al , 2020). Specifically, Thakur and Kannadhasan (2019) found corruption and low investor protection, while Li et al (2020) identified interlocking directorship in network centrality (political connection) and structural holes as the determinants of corporate cash holding.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies identified corruption, country peculiarities and firm characteristics as the predictors of cash holding (Tran, 2019; and Li et al , 2020). Specifically, Thakur and Kannadhasan (2019) found corruption and low investor protection, while Li et al (2020) identified interlocking directorship in network centrality (political connection) and structural holes as the determinants of corporate cash holding. Loncan (2018) examined corporate cash holding policy in 23 emerging economies and found financial constraints as a predictor, while the presence of foreign institutional ownership has a negative effect on cash holding.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cash holding not only is a subject of increasing interest in political and academic discussions but also is essential for the ordinary investor because of comprehensive media reports regarding several global firm's cash holding practices such as Google, Apple, and Microsoft [11][12][13][14]. A recent study by da Cruz et al [15] finds the upward trend in cash holding around the globe; therefore, corporate cash holding is a vital phenomenon in the corporate setting nowadays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e study investigates the board financial expertise's impact on corporate cash holding, which is motivated by two reasons. First, comprehensive media reports about several firm's cash holding practices like Google, Apple, and Microsoft [12,14], along with renowned corporate scandals like HealthSouth, Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco [38,39], have shifted the attention of regulators and market makers to have financial expertise on board for effective corporate governance mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%