2017
DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2017)004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directions for model building from asymptotic safety

Abstract: Building on recent advances in the understanding of gauge-Yukawa theories we explore possibilities to UV-complete the Standard Model in an asymptotically safe manner. Minimal extensions are based on a large flavor sector of additional fermions coupled to a scalar singlet matrix field. We find that asymptotic safety requires fermions in higher representations of SU(3) C × SU(2) L . Possible signatures at colliders are worked out and include R-hadron searches, diboson signatures and the evolution of the strong a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
153
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(147 reference statements)
2
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the canonical dimensions of u, v are 4 − d, this result can again be read as an effective dimensional increase induced by metric fluctuations. For the couplings 18) this implies exactly the same gravity contribution. Stability of the potential is given if…”
Section: Next-to-next-to Leading Ordermentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the canonical dimensions of u, v are 4 − d, this result can again be read as an effective dimensional increase induced by metric fluctuations. For the couplings 18) this implies exactly the same gravity contribution. Stability of the potential is given if…”
Section: Next-to-next-to Leading Ordermentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The corresponding models feature similar building blocks to the Standard Model. Thus, the asymptotic-safety paradigm could potentially play a role in beyond-Standard-Model physics at scales below the Planck scale [17,18], with possible consequences for phenomenological questions [19][20][21][22]. On the other hand, there are compelling hints for asymptotic safety of gravity without [23] and with [24] matter beyond the Planck scale, for reviews, see [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we offer one possible such alternative explanation based on [25]; another possibility which bears some resemblance to the present scheme as far as physics up to M PL is concerned (but not beyond) is to invoke asymptotic safety, see e.g. [13,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The treelevel contributions to the decay widths in the formulas above follow immediately from the vertices in Eqs. (27) and (23)- (24), 11 while nonzero contributions to ε ji originate from the interference between these tree-level vertices and loop diagrams describing the correction to proper vertices and external lines [65]. Generically, both kinds of corrections are of the same order [65], and are way too small to ensure a successful leptogenesis for Y ν having the 8 In the following we adopt the convention that primed quantities refer to the pure SM, while unprimed letters refer to the CSM with its enlarged set of fields.…”
Section: A Cp Violationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation