2018
DOI: 10.1364/oe.26.029074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional scattering and multipolar contributions to optical forces on silicon nanoparticles in focused laser beams

Abstract: Nanoparticles made of high index dielectric materials have seen a surge of interest and have been proposed for various applications, such as metalenses, light harvesting and directional scattering. With the advent of fabrication techniques enabling colloidal suspensions, the prospects of optical manipulation of such nanoparticles becomes paramount. High index nanoparticles support electric and magnetic multipolar responses in the visible regime and interference between such modes can give rise to highly direct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong suppression of forward scattering was already experimentally observed in the microwave regime [16] at this condition, in agreement with the near-zero-forward intensity condition for Rayleigh particles [5,7]. A strong suppression of forward scattering is an important issue in light transport and scattering in nanostructured complex media [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], being also relevant in the discussion of the, so-called, anapole modes [19,49,50], as well as in the context of optical forces [51][52][53][54][55]. In most of the above-mentioned works, the equivalence between the GSKC and the near zero-forward condition was taken from granted even though it was only demonstrated in the Rayleigh limit, where the particle scattering cross sections are very small.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…A strong suppression of forward scattering was already experimentally observed in the microwave regime [16] at this condition, in agreement with the near-zero-forward intensity condition for Rayleigh particles [5,7]. A strong suppression of forward scattering is an important issue in light transport and scattering in nanostructured complex media [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], being also relevant in the discussion of the, so-called, anapole modes [19,49,50], as well as in the context of optical forces [51][52][53][54][55]. In most of the above-mentioned works, the equivalence between the GSKC and the near zero-forward condition was taken from granted even though it was only demonstrated in the Rayleigh limit, where the particle scattering cross sections are very small.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…This explains why this interference effect cannot affect the intensity‐gradient force in the case of circularly polarized Gaussian beams, as observed in ref. []. Additionally, because its curl ∇ × F r (Ki) ∝ ∇cos2 θ × ∇ I does not vanish in general, F r (Ki) represents a nonconservative mechanical property of the intensity gradients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in studying the asymmetry of light scattering, and it has now pervaded various branches of nanophotonics . On the other hand, with the establishment of dipolar optomechanical model, the Kerker interference rapidly arouse attentions from the wide field of optical manipulation . The unique mechanical effect of the Kerker interference has breathed a new life into this area, refreshing our understanding on optical forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Black) Electronic dipole contribution (σ e = n 2 ωα e /c ), (red) magnetic dipole contribution(σ m = n 2 ωα m /c), (green) electric dipole plus magnetic dipole contributions and (blue) total extinction cross section configuration, corresponds to the first Kerker condition of the silicon particle α m = α e . Kerker conditions have been previously proved to be important in the particular case of pulling forces [36] 2.4 Description of the experiment proposed…”
Section: The Particlementioning
confidence: 99%