1977
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(77)90099-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional lipophilic character in a series of psychotomimetic phenethylamine derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding 3C-O derivatives ( Figure 2 , structures 13-19 ) displayed a comparable 5-HT 2A vs. 5-HT 2C binding preference but did not bind to the 5-HT 1A receptor (section 4.2). The observed moderate 5-HT 2A vs. 5-HT 2C subtype selectivity is in accordance with the many other phenethylamine and amphetamine ligands described by others (Glennon et al, 1980; Glennon et al, 1986; Glennon et al, 1994; Nichols et al, 1994; Nelson et al, 1999; Nichols et al, 2015; Rickli et al, 2015; Nichols, 2016; Rickli et al, 2016; Luethi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The corresponding 3C-O derivatives ( Figure 2 , structures 13-19 ) displayed a comparable 5-HT 2A vs. 5-HT 2C binding preference but did not bind to the 5-HT 1A receptor (section 4.2). The observed moderate 5-HT 2A vs. 5-HT 2C subtype selectivity is in accordance with the many other phenethylamine and amphetamine ligands described by others (Glennon et al, 1980; Glennon et al, 1986; Glennon et al, 1994; Nichols et al, 1994; Nelson et al, 1999; Nichols et al, 2015; Rickli et al, 2015; Nichols, 2016; Rickli et al, 2016; Luethi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to Barfknecht and Nichols (1975), the optimum lipophilicity for a series of hallucinogenic phenylisopropylamines is log P = 3.14. Mescaline has a relatively low log P value of 0.78, whereas the values for escaline (log P = 1.11) and proscaline (log P = 1.70) are closer to the optimum level (Nichols and Dyer, 1977; Nichols et al, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…67 A later study identified a steric limitation to the size of the 4-substituent, suggesting that an alkyl group of only about three carbon atoms was tolerated before the activity dropped off. 68 By contrast, polar 4-substituents such as OH, NH 2 , and COOH gave compounds with very low affinity (K i > 25,000 nM). 69 The latter study also examined compounds with very long lipophilic 4-substituents such as n-hexyl and n-octyl, which had high affinities at […”
Section: Ring Substituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%